Monday, January 6, 2014

Prashant Bhushan’s stumble on J&K: Why BJP is hoping for more

Is the Congress making a terrible miscalculation by hoping that Arvind Kejriwal's rise will hit the campaign of BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi? There seems to be a clear gap between the top leadership of the party and the rank and file on the issue.

The latter feel that the AAP's phenomenal rise in positive perception is inimical to the ruling party's interests in the coming parliamentary elections. However, the senior leaders believe that in urban constituencies the new party will eat into the anti-incumbency votes that would otherwise could go to the BJP or Modi, and thereby minimise the losses of the ruling party.

The party clearly has not learnt any lessons from the Delhi election results. The reason the Congress landed up with just eight seats, after securing a two-third majority in the Delhi assembly in successive elections, was due to increased competition between its two challengers, the BJP and AAP. It is now an open secret that the Congress virtually bent over backwards to give Arvind Kejriwal support, despite his harsh words about the party and its leadership, in order to curtail the BJP's prospects in the event the Delhi assembly elections were held around the time of the Parliamentary elections.

The rise of the AAP has the BJP worried. PTI

The rise of the AAP has the BJP worried. PTI

The performance of newly appointed Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely during Kejriwal's trust vote was telling. Lovely didn't seem to be downcast over his party's complete decimation in the elections and being forced to play a subservient role. Instead in his half-hour-long speech, he spoke of the irony that the BJP couldn't come to power despite being the single largest party in the assembly. Many see his stance as an indicator of how Congress was shaping its policy for the upcoming general elections.

The BJP's leadership and cadre are worried about the rise of AAP and the kind of attention that it has been getting since the Congress decided to support it to form a government in Delhi. The party is now trying to reformulate its electoral strategy and is also waiting for AAP to slip up.

Senior AAP leader Prashant Bhushan's statement seeking a referendum in Jammu and Kashmir on the Indian Army's continued presence in Kashmir was perhaps the first real opportunity. The most articulate and urbane face of the BJP, Arun Jaitley went ballistic about it and other leaders also joined in.

The AAP also suffered some embarassment when its young Women and Child Welfare Minister, Rakhi Birla, pressurised cops to lodge and FIR and alleged a conspiracy by unidentified persons when the windshield of her car was accidentally broken by a child playing cricket. The child's family had claimed that they had apologised to the minister on the spot.

And then came another contentious demand for hiking the quota for disadvantaged social groups from senior AAP leader Yogendra Yadav. Though other political parties would not comment on the issue for obvious reasons, it has sparked off a raging debate on social media. Interestingly, a substantive section of young AAP supporters and sympathisers are firm believers in abolishing such quotas.

Incidents like these do cast some doubts about the AAP's thought process and ability to provide a long term governance model, but they would still be considered too trivial to adversely impact the party's rise.

The AAP's decision to go national and talk about Arvind Kejriwal running for PM, though he has denied any plans to contest parliamentary elections, has made the run up to the elections even more interesting. There is a feeling among leaders of some political parties, most prominently the BJP, that the Congress knew that 2014 elections was a lost case for it. The party was routed in last month's assembly elections in four north Indian states and could well predict its fate in the parliamentary polls. It was therefore focussed not so much about winning a third term at the centre, but to minimise the scale of its defeat and prevent Modi's victory to a level which might find potential allies gravitating towards the BJP.

However, the Congress leadership is perhaps discounting the fact that though AAP is gaining ground in the middle class, and also in a section of youth, which otherwise was presumed to be a solid Modi constituency, it is making deeper inroads in Congress's social constituency of urban poor.

The Muslim community too is weighing AAP rise with great deal of curiosity. The Congress has so far been banking on the fact that the Muslim community would be against Modi and would therefore cast their votes in in their favour.

Though the AAP's case is slightly different from its predecessors, the Congress leadership in the past has experimented by nurturing splinter groups and new political outfits to contain its rival's prospects and boost its own. It has been successful in some experiments and failed it others.

Telugu super star Chiranjeevi forming a new party ahead of Andhra Pradesh state elections served as a boon to the Congress as it cut into the anti-incumbency votes, which could have otherwise gone to the TDP. The actor has since then joined the Congress and is the tourism minister in UPA 2.

It is widely speculated that the Congress and NCP supported Raj Thackeray's ambitions and provided his Maharashtra Navnirman Sena the support to stand against the Shiv Sena. The split in the Shiv Sena's traditional support base has hurt the BJP-Shiv Sena combine's chances of winning for the last two assembly polls.

But in two other instances, in Punjab and in Gujarat, its flirtation with Manpreet Badal and Keshubhai Patel failed to have any popular impact. In the last Gujarat elections it was known to all and sundry that dissident Keshubhai Patel's GPP was fighting a proxy battle for the Congress. The party had banked heavily on Kehubhai's influence in the Saurashtra region to try and undermine Modi campaign for a third term, but it failed miserably.

Senior BJP leaders are of the opinion that since Modi had already gained a lot of traction among the electorate and created a buzz even in rural areas, it would be very difficult, if not impossible to undermine his campaign.

A close Modi aide said the BJP had already gained such a large lead that the AAP would not be able to play spoiler even if ate into Modi's support base. He cited the example of Delhi, where many in the party believe that if the party had announced Harsh Vardhan's name as its chief ministerial candidate well in advance, rather than just a month ahead of the actual date of polling, the results would have been different. Modi has also already completed his first round of campaigning in almost all states before rivals could even start contemplating it.

The BJP is no longer taking AAP lightly and is consistently trying to highlight AAP's mistakes, big or small. A case in point is the Prashant Bhushans' statement on a referendum in Kashmir. Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley has equated that with separatist anti-national stance.

"It is regrettable that for a party like the Aam Aadmi Party which nourishes national ambitions, should adopt a position hostile to India's interests. The issues of national security cannot be decided by populism or referendum. They can only be decided on security considerations," he said in a statement.

However, for now, the Congress can take heart from one fact. Kewjriwal is making bigger headlines than Modi. The BJP is hoping that the coverage of the AAP's will reduce after it reaches saturation at some point.


Nitish keeps mum on AAP threat to other political units

Patna: Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. PTI[/caption] today refused to join debate on a perception that the Aam Admi Party (AAP) will pose a serious threat to mainstream political parties after storming to power in Delhi last month, saying everybody has a right to form a party.

"Everybody has a right to form a political party and seek elections under the parliamentary system which allows all to participate in competitive politics," he told reporters after emerging from a Janata Ke Durbur Mein Mukhyamantri programme at his official residence.Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. PTI

The chief minister, however, sought to make light of the raging debate that the AAP could emerge as a major political factor in the country in the coming days, saying the fledgling political outfit was the "latest media hype".

"AAP is the latest media hype...earlier it was something else," he said apparently referring to the news of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi being declared as the BJP's prime ministerial candidate last year.

On his own party, the JD(U)'s electoral strategy, Kumar said he has "eight fronts working against him", but refused to elaborate.

The chief minister also said that he had talks with JVM(P) president Babulal Marandi to explore the possibility of working together in future on common agenda, but beyond that nothing had been worked out.

On the Patna High Court acquitting all 14 persons convicted by a lower court in the mass murder of 16 people in Khagaria district over three years ago for lack of evidence, Kumar said the order will be challenged in the higher court.

On scarcity of sand in Bihar, the chief minister said a new sand mining policy was being worked out under the framework of the Supreme Court order.

PTI


AAP adopts Vishakha guidelines on sexual harassment

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party on Monday said it adopted Vishakha guidlines, set by the Supreme Court, and formed a committee to look into possible cases of sexual exploitation in the party.

AAP_Confrence_ShrutiDhapola"Aam Aadmi Party is the first party in the country to adopt Vishakha guidelines prescribed by the Supreme Court. We will soon put the guidelines in the public domain," said party spokesperson Sanjay Pandey in a press conference.

As per the Supreme Court guidelines, any organisation with more than 20 women should have a three-member committee to look into the cases of exploitation, if any, and take necessary discplinary action. Two of these should be from within the organisation while one an outsider.

The committee comprises two party members while the third member is an outsider.

The party has nominated Atishi Marlena, a key member of the policy and manifesto committee of the party and Preeti Sharma-Menon from Mumbai who has been an active member of the anti-corruption movement.

The party nominated Leela Ramdas, social activist and wife of retired Navy chief Laxminarayan Ramdas as the third member of the committee.

"If we come across any case in the country in which if there are complaints related to exploitation of women, then this platform will review such cases and take necessary disciplinary action.

PTI


There was no wrongdoing in Adarsh: Sushilkumar Shinde

Mumbai: Rubbishing allegations of corruption in the allotment of flats in the Adarsh housing society, Union home minister Sushilkumar Shinde today said the charge was baseless.

"There was no wrongdoing in Adarsh (flat allotment). The land belongs to the state government and there was no reservation for Kargil (jawans)," Shinde told reporters here tonight.

Sushilkumar Shinde. PTI

Sushilkumar Shinde. PTI

The senior Congress leader was speaking after unveiling a bust of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar in suburban Kandivli. These were the first public comments by Shinde, who is among the former chief ministers of Maharashtra credited with "political patronage" by the judicial commission, which probed the Adarsh scam.

The Maharashtra government had, on 20 December, rejected the report of the judicial commission of inquiry on the Adarsh scam, tabled in the Legislative Assembly.

However, after Rahul Gandhi's intervention the government this month decided to partially implement the panel's recommendations, which the opposition has alleged, favours politicians while putting the onus only on bureaucrats.

The report of the two-member commission headed by retired High Court judge J A Patil indicted several politicians including four former Chief Ministers- Ashok Chavan, late Vilasrao Deshmukh, Sushilkumar Shinde and Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil- for "blatant violations" of statutory provisions.

To a query on terror inputs received by the Home ministry, Shinde said, "We keep getting such inputs from time to time."

PTI


Congress, BJP concerned over proposed EC, Google tie-up

New Delhi: Congress and BJP today voiced concern over the proposed tie-up of Election Commission with internet giant Google for voter facilitation services ahead of the next general elections, saying stakeholders should have been consulted before taking such a decision.

Sources said the Congress legal cell has written to the Chief Election Commissioner raising security concerns over the proposed tie-up and hoped it will not have any effect on the electoral process and national security.

Representational image. Reuters

Representational image. Reuters

"It seems to be a very sensitive issue... It seems to have been done without consulting all stakeholders," AICC Secretary K C Mittal, who is incharge of Congress legal and human rights department, has said in a letter to CEC.

Asked about the proposed tie-up by EC, BJP also expressed concern and said the issue could have been discussed first at an all-party meeting by EC.

"Though we do not doubt the intentions of the Election Commission. The matter could have been first discussed with various stakeholders at the all-party meeting before taking a final decision.... It does raise some security concerns," said BJP Vice President Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi.

Security concerns on the tie-up between EC and Google were also raised by a group of cybersecurity experts who have questioned the poll body's move. The experts have written to the EC amid concerns over sharing of vital data pertaining to Indians to a foreign company.

The concerns also come at a time when eyebrows have been raised over sharing of other vital data of Indians with the United States in light of exposes about widespread intelligence gathering by the US agencies exposed by Edward Snowden.

They have also said that while India is considered a software giant with major Indian IT companies providing vital support to US and the poll body instead of choosing Indian companies has sought to engage a US-based company.

On the request of US-based Google, the Election Commission has proposed a tie-up with it for online voter registration and making available vital details about Voter EPIC card numbers and polling station location.

PTI


AAP govt to introduce biometric attendance system in Secretariat

New Delhi: The AAP government in Delhi has decided to introduce biometric attendance system in the Secretariat and all government offices in the capital to ensure "effective functioning".

"The decision on biometric attendance system was taken in a meeting in which Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was also present," a government official told IANS.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. AFP

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. AFP

According to officials, Administrative Reforms Minister Somnath Bharti proposed the move to Kejriwal who agreed to it.

"To make the government functioning more effective, Bharti has proposed this. It will be implemented in a day or two. There was no such system during Congress rule," an official said.

Bharti has issued directions to all the concerned departments regarding the measure.

IANS


Jayalalithaa DA case: Special Court judge visits RBI treasury

Chennai: A Special court judge from Karnataka on Monday visited the regional office of Reserve Bank of India in Chennai, in connection with the disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa. PTI

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa. PTI

Special judge John Michael D'Cunha visited the RBI treasury, where valuables in connection with the case are being kept, police sources said.

The Special Court in Bangalore, trying the Rs 66.65 crore disproportionate assets case against Jayalalithaa, had allowed a plea by DMK General Secretary K Anbazhagan seeking physical production of valuables and other assets seized from her in 1997.

Special Court Judge D'Cunha ordered the transit of the seized material from Chennai to Bangalore, observing that it was required for giving fair justice. The seized material is deposited in an RBI treasury in the city.

In his application, Anbazhagan had pleaded that the court should take custody of 800 kg silver, 28 kg gold, 750 pairs of shoes, 10,500 sarees, 91 watches and other items that were seized during a raid in 1997 as evidence.

Jayalalithaa's advocates, however, had labelled the plea as political vendetta and argued the physical production was not mandated under the law.

PTI


Cops claim Rakhi Birla’s car was damaged by cricket ball

New Delhi: A day after Delhi Minister Rakhi Birla's car was allegedly attacked in Mangolpuri, police today claimed that the vehicle's windshield was accidentally damaged by a cricket ball but her aides were not convinced.

Yesterday, 26-year-old Birla had lodged a complaint at Mangolpuri police station stating that someone from crowd threw a stone at her windshield while she was returning after attending a function at the Santoshi Mata Mandir at 6.15 pm.

Rakhi Birla. Ibnlive

Rakhi Birla. Ibnlive

The windscreen of Birla's car was hit by a cricket ball as a group of boys was playing cricket in the area, a police official said.

The incident reportedly happened in R-Block Mangolpuri, which falls in constituency of the Women and Child Development Minister.

However, when contacted, a close aide of the Minister said they were not convinced.

"When the incident had happened, some of us who were also inside the car got down and asked the crowd which had gathered but nobody came forward. Now it's said that it was cricket ball. It all seems to be a conspiracy," the minister's aide said.

However, immediately after the incident Birla had
reiterated that she will not take any police protection and
was "undeterred" by the attack.

In keeping with AAP's promise on austerity, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has refused to take any security with all of his six ministers saying they would follow in their leader's footsteps in that regard.

PTI


Prashant Bhushan’s stumble on J&K: Why the BJP is hoping for more

Is the Congress making a terrible miscalculation by hoping that Arvind Kejriwal's rise will hit the campaign of BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi? There seems to be a clear gap between the top leadership of the party and the rank and file on the issue.

The latter feel that the AAP's phenomenal rise in positive perception is inimical to the ruling party's interests in the coming parliamentary elections. However, the senior leaders believe that in urban constituencies the new party will eat into the anti-incumbency votes that would otherwise could go to the BJP or Modi, and thereby minimise the losses of the ruling party.

The party clearly has not learnt any lessons from the Delhi election results. The reason the Congress landed up with just eight seats, after securing a two-third majority in the Delhi assembly in successive elections, was due to increased competition between its two challengers, the BJP and AAP. It is now an open secret that the Congress virtually bent over backwards to give Arvind Kejriwal support, despite his harsh words about the party and its leadership, in order to curtail the BJP's prospects in the event the Delhi assembly elections were held around the time of the Parliamentary elections.

The rise of the AAP has the BJP worried. PTI

The rise of the AAP has the BJP worried. PTI

The performance of newly appointed Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely during Kejriwal's trust vote was telling. Lovely didn't seem to be downcast over his party's complete decimation in the elections and being forced to play a subservient role. Instead in his half-hour-long speech, he spoke of the irony that the BJP couldn't come to power despite being the single largest party in the assembly. Many see his stance as an indicator of how Congress was shaping its policy for the upcoming general elections.

The BJP's leadership and cadre are worried about the rise of AAP and the kind of attention that it has been getting since the Congress decided to support it to form a government in Delhi. The party is now trying to reformulate its electoral strategy and is also waiting for AAP to slip up.

Senior AAP leader Prashant Bhushan's statement seeking a referendum in Jammu and Kashmir on the Indian Army's continued presence in Kashmir was perhaps the first real opportunity. The most articulate and urbane face of the BJP, Arun Jaitley went ballistic about it and other leaders also joined in.

The AAP also suffered some embarassment when its young Women and Child Welfare Minister, Rakhi Birla, pressurised cops to lodge and FIR and alleged a conspiracy by unidentified persons when the windshield of her car was accidentally broken by a child playing cricket. The child's family had claimed that they had apologised to the minister on the spot.

And then came another contentious demand for hiking the quota for disadvantaged social groups from senior AAP leader Yogendra Yadav. Though other political parties would not comment on the issue for obvious reasons, it has sparked off a raging debate on social media. Interestingly, a substantive section of young AAP supporters and sympathisers are firm believers in abolishing such quotas.

Incidents like these do cast some doubts about the AAP's thought process and ability to provide a long term governance model, but they would still be considered too trivial to adversely impact the party's rise.

The AAP's decision to go national and talk about Arvind Kejriwal running for PM, though he has denied any plans to contest parliamentary elections, has made the run up to the elections even more interesting. There is a feeling among leaders of some political parties, most prominently the BJP, that the Congress knew that 2014 elections was a lost case for it. The party was routed in last month's assembly elections in four north Indian states and could well predict its fate in the parliamentary polls. It was therefore focussed not so much about winning a third term at the centre, but to minimise the scale of its defeat and prevent Modi's victory to a level which might find potential allies gravitating towards the BJP.

However, the Congress leadership is perhaps discounting the fact that though AAP is gaining ground in the middle class, and also in a section of youth, which otherwise was presumed to be a solid Modi constituency, it is making deeper inroads in Congress's social constituency of urban poor.

The Muslim community too is weighing AAP rise with great deal of curiosity. The Congress has so far been banking on the fact that the Muslim community would be against Modi and would therefore cast their votes in in their favour.

Though the AAP's case is slightly different from its predecessors, the Congress leadership in the past has experimented by nurturing splinter groups and new political outfits to contain its rival's prospects and boost its own. It has been successful in some experiments and failed it others.

Telugu super star Chiranjeevi forming a new party ahead of Andhra Pradesh state elections served as a boon to the Congress as it cut into the anti-incumbency votes, which could have otherwise gone to the TDP. The actor has since then joined the Congress and is the tourism minister in UPA 2.

It is widely speculated that the Congress and NCP supported Raj Thackeray's ambitions and provided his Maharashtra Navnirman Sena the support to stand against the Shiv Sena. The split in the Shiv Sena's traditional support base has hurt the BJP-Shiv Sena combine's chances of winning for the last two assembly polls.

But in two other instances, in Punjab and in Gujarat, its flirtation with Manpreet Badal and Keshubhai Patel failed to have any popular impact. In the last Gujarat elections it was known to all and sundry that dissident Keshubhai Patel's GPP was fighting a proxy battle for the Congress. The party had banked heavily on Kehubhai's influence in the Saurashtra region to try and undermine Modi campaign for a third term, but it failed miserably.

Senior BJP leaders are of the opinion that since Modi had already gained a lot of traction among the electorate and created a buzz even in rural areas, it would be very difficult, if not impossible to undermine his campaign.

A close Modi aide said the BJP had already gained such a large lead that the AAP would not be able to play spoiler even if ate into Modi's support base. He cited the example of Delhi, where many in the party believe that if the party had announced Harsh Vardhan's name as its chief ministerial candidate well in advance, rather than just a month ahead of the actual date of polling, the results would have been different. Modi has also already completed his first round of campaigning in almost all states before rivals could even start contemplating it.

The BJP is no longer taking AAP lightly and is consistently trying to highlight AAP's mistakes, big or small. A case in point is the Prashant Bhushans' statement on a referendum in Kashmir. Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley has equated that with separatist anti-national stance.

"It is regrettable that for a party like the Aam Aadmi Party which nourishes national ambitions, should adopt a position hostile to India's interests. The issues of national security cannot be decided by populism or referendum. They can only be decided on security considerations," he said in a statement.

However, for now, the Congress can take heart from one fact. Kewjriwal is making bigger headlines than Modi. The BJP is hoping that the coverage of the AAP's will reduce after it reaches saturation at some point.


Nitish Kumar keeps mum on PM’s comments on Narendra Modi

Patna: Chief Minister Nitish Kumar today refused to comment on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's much publicised remarks that it will be disastrous for the country if BJP's prime ministerial hopeful Narendra Modi succeeds in his ambitions.

"I did not watch the live telecast of the Prime Minister's press conference three days ago, so I am not in a position to comment on his remarks (on Modi)," he told reporters replying to a volley of questions on the issue.

Nitish Kumar. AFP

Nitish Kumar. AFP

"I have nothing to say on what the Prime Minister said on the issue," Kumar said.

On his views on qualities for a person aspiring to be the Prime Minister of the country, Kumar maintained his past stand on the issue that a person occupying such constitutional post should be secular, liberal and one who can take all sections of the people along, but he/she should not have rough edges.

The "rough edges" remark was aimed at the Gujarat Chief Minister for his alleged role in the 2002 post-Godhra riots, which Kumar had said on numerous occasions earlier.

On the Prime Minister's press conference, Kumar repeated that it was a farewell affair by Singh, but refused to comment on the speculation doing rounds that the Congress may project its vice-president Rahul Gandhi as its prime ministerial candidate.

"It's an internal matter of a political party," Kumar said.

PTI


Snooping scandal: Gujarat Police refuse to file FIR against Modi, Shah

Ahmedabad: Gujarat Police on Monday refused to register an FIR against Chief Minister Narendra Modi, his aide Amit Shah and others in the snooping scandal on a complaint by suspended IAS officer Pradeep Sharma, who threatened to move the court.

File photo of Pradeep Sharma. IBNLive

File photo of Pradeep Sharma. IBNLive

Sharma, whose name has figured in the raging row, approached Gandhinagar police with his complaint and sought an FIR to be registered but the police merely accepted his application.

"Police Inspector (in-charge) of Sector-7 police station accepted the application but refused to file an FIR. So, I am now going to SP office to register my complaint," Sharma told reporters and said he would move the court if his endeavour to get an FIR registered failed.

The suspended IAS officer said he was the aggrieved party and therefore, he had the locus standi to file the FIR.

"Sector-7 police station officials refused to take any action initially. They asked me to go to commission or the court," he said.

"This is a cognizable offence and the Supreme Court has said that an FIR should be lodged in a cognizable offence. I have submitted evidence of audio clippings of the two websites (Gulail and Cobra post)," he said.

"My complaints are against Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, former state Home minister Amit Shah, then Inspector General (intelligence) A K Sharma and others," he said.

Sharma also said the Commissions of Inquiry constituted to probe the scandal have powers to make recommendations but it is the police which has to register an FIR, investigate and prosecute.

"A Commission of Inquiry has got nothing to do with a criminal activity. If a criminal case takes place, an FIR has to be filed," he said, adding, "The Commission does not look into the criminality."

When contacted, Gandhinagar SP Sharad Singhal said Sharma's application has been accepted, but refused to elaborate.

Two investigative news portals, Cobrapost.com and Gulail.com, had claimed on 15 November that former Minister of State for Home in Gujarat Amit Shah had ordered illegal surveillance of a woman at the behest of one "Saheb", believed to be Modi.

They had released taped conversations between Shah and suspended IPS officer G L Singhal to support their claim, but said that its authenticity could not be confirmed.

PTI


Gujarat minister Anandi Patel’s husband Mafat not to join AAP

Ahmedabad: Gujarat Revenue Minister Anandi Patel's husband Mafat, who was to join Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) state unit today after its spectacular debut in Delhi, has now changed his mind after consulting family.

"I was to join AAP today. But after discussions with my family members, I have decided not to join the party now. I deferred the decision," said Mafat Patel.

AAP volunteers. AFP

AAP volunteers. AFP

He, however, did not clarify whether he would join the party at a later date.

Speculation had gained ground in the last few days that Mafat was all set to join the AAP following its stunning performance in the Delhi Assembly elections.

The 76-year-old leader, who is estranged from his wife and lives separately for the last 20 years, and was a BJP member in the 1990s, said that national parties like BJP and Congress have no longer represent the common man.

"BJP and Congress have no longer remained common man's parties. They don't think of the common man. They are only concerned with power and are least worried about serving people," he said.

Riding on an anti-corruption plank, AAP won 28 of the 70 Assembly seats in Delhi and formed a government in the national capital with outside support of Congress.

Anandi Patel is the among the senior-most minister in Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet.

PTI


Why AAP can’t afford Prashant Bhushan pulling a Digvijaya

From the Gandhi topis to the profuse use of the words 'aam aadmi' in every sentence they utter, Arvind Kejriwal's AAP leaders have laboriously tried to sound like carbon copies of each other in its short existence. However, with the party coming to power in Delhi, slowly, it is starting to sound more like a political party, as opposed to a students' movement where every participant says the same things in shrill, fervent tones. Given that the power dynamics of the party were fraught with problems right at its inception, it was just a matter of time before differences in opinions started surfacing. When Arvind Kejriwal and his band of supporters moved away from the power centre that was Anna Hazare in the anti-corruption stir, the founding leaders of the AAP came across as one nucleus, out to chart its own course.

And soon after, possibly because Kejriwal was the relentless voice of them all and was also more visible to people thanks to his fasting stint with Anna, he emerged as the most recognised, media-savvy leader who could be the face of the Aam Aadmi Party. However, while Kejriwal's role in the party can not be undermined, it is true that the logistics of running a political party demands physical and intellectual inputs from more than just one person. While Kejriwal has never visibly tried to eclipse the public life of most of his close coterie of leaders, the latter have always routinely echoed what he had had to say on most issues. Except for Prashant Bhushan.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

A Supreme Court lawyer by profession, Bhushan was actively involved in the foundation building exercises of the AAP. One will recollect when AAP, led by Kejriwal, went on an 'expose' spree to herald its entry into politics, Bhushan was almost always the one fielding questions from the media alongside Kejriwal. From details about Nitin Gadkari's Purti Group to Robert Vadra's land deals, Bhushan was a prominent presence in all the public announcements of the AAP in its nascent stages. From giving out details of alleged scams, to appearing in television shows to counter the political bigwigs ranting about a new kid on the block, to following up the issues, Bhushan was the face of the AAP's activism days. In fact, the continuous string of exposes by the party led the Congress and BJP to turn the heat on Bhushan and accuse him of indulging in a shady land deal in his hometown in Himachal Pradesh.

However, with the party's upward swing in the political landscape of the country Bhushan, a member of the national executive of the party, seemed to take a step back from the limelight. Around the same time, some of his opinions on important national issues, failed to resonate with the rest of the party.

Right after the elections, while speculations were rife that AAP will seek the support of either the Congress or the BJP, AAP leaders put up a stoic face and went on a rumour rejection trip. However, it was reported that Bhushan had told the media that if the BJP meets AAP's conditions, the party was willing to support BJP. As the news leaked out, Arvind Kejriwal immediately announced that he didn't endorse Bhushan's view. In fact, he dismissed what Bhushan said that the latter's personal opinion. More recently, Bhushan declared that there should be a referendum on the Kashmir issue. As the BJP pounced on the opportunity declaring Bhushan anti-national, Kejriwal, once again distanced himself from the comment conveying that Bhushan's view was not essentially the party's view.

While it is completely understandable if two members of a political party have conflicting views on the same subject, the problem with AAP is, unlike say a Congress, it cannot afford to have a leader on the lines of Digvijaya Singh, whose hurried comments the party is left covering up for. It is possibly true that leaders expressing contrary opinions within a party helps a party, especially a young one like AAP, develop its politics and deepen its impact. At the same time, however, the party can't falter on its public relations strategies. In fact, it is no short of surprising that a party like AAP, with a strong social media back-up has had to face up to public relations faux pas like the recent Kejriwal, Bhushan disagreement.

Because like the BJP made evident this time, any small difference in opinion within the AAP will be played up by the Opposition to hint at an unstable party and hence an equally unreliable government. With the AAP facing a fair share of apprehension about its policies and its efficacy, it is probably better advised to decide on a bunch of spokerpersons who speak to the media after an internal consultation.

It is important to note here that following the AAP's win, while leaders like Yogendra Yadav have been constantly seen making media appearances, with members like Kumar Vishwas stepping in, in his absence, Bhushan seems to be on a media hiatus. With the odds facing the AAP stacking up, it is probably high time the AAP come up with a strong public relations policy that will save the party further embarrassment.

 


Why AAP can’t afford a Prashant Bhushan pulling a Digvijaya

From the Gandhi topis to the profuse use of the words 'aam aadmi' in every sentence they utter, Arvind Kejriwal's AAP leaders have laboriously tried to sound like carbon copies of each other in its short existence. However, with the party coming to power in Delhi, slowly, it is starting to sound more like a political party, as opposed to a students' movement where every participant says the same things in shrill, fervent tones. Given that the power dynamics of the party were fraught with problems right at its inception, it was just a matter of time before differences in opinions started surfacing. When Arvind Kejriwal and his band of supporters moved away from the power centre that was Anna Hazare in the anti-corruption stir, the founding leaders of the AAP came across as one nucleus, out to chart its own course.

And soon after, possibly because Kejriwal was the relentless voice of them all and was also more visible to people thanks to his fasting stint with Anna, he emerged as the most recognised, media-savvy leader who could be the face of the Aam Aadmi Party. However, while Kejriwal's role in the party can not be undermined, it is true that the logistics of running a political party demands physical and intellectual inputs from more than just one person. While Kejriwal has never visibly tried to eclipse the public life of most of his close coterie of leaders, the latter have always routinely echoed what he had had to say on most issues. Except for Prashant Bhushan.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

A Supreme Court lawyer by profession, Bhushan was actively involved in the foundation building exercises of the AAP. One will recollect when AAP, led by Kejriwal, went on an 'expose' spree to herald its entry into politics, Bhushan was almost always the one fielding questions from the media alongside Kejriwal. From details about Nitin Gadkari's Purti Group to Robert Vadra's land deals, Bhushan was a prominent presence in all the public announcements of the AAP in its nascent stages. From giving out details of alleged scams, to appearing in television shows to counter the political bigwigs ranting about a new kid on the block, to following up the issues, Bhushan was the face of the AAP's activism days. In fact, the continuous string of exposes by the party led the Congress and BJP to turn the heat on Bhushan and accuse him of indulging in a shady land deal in his hometown in Himachal Pradesh.

However, with the party's upward swing in the political landscape of the country Bhushan, a member of the national executive of the party, seemed to take a step back from the limelight. Around the same time, some of his opinions on important national issues, failed to resonate with the rest of the party.

Right after the elections, while speculations were rife that AAP will seek the support of either the Congress or the BJP, AAP leaders put up a stoic face and went on a rumour rejection trip. However, it was reported that Bhushan had told the media that if the BJP meets AAP's conditions, the party was willing to support BJP. As the news leaked out, Arvind Kejriwal immediately announced that he didn't endorse Bhushan's view. In fact, he dismissed what Bhushan said that the latter's personal opinion. More recently, Bhushan declared that there should be a referendum on the Kashmir issue. As the BJP pounced on the opportunity declaring Bhushan anti-national, Kejriwal, once again distanced himself from the comment conveying that Bhushan's view was not essentially the party's view.

While it is completely understandable if two members of a political party have conflicting views on the same subject, the problem with AAP is, unlike say a Congress, it cannot afford to have a leader on the lines of Digvijaya Singh, whose hurried comments the party is left covering up for. It is possibly true that leaders expressing contrary opinions within a party helps a party, especially a young one like AAP, develop its politics and deepen its impact. At the same time, however, the party can't falter on its public relations strategies. In fact, it is no short of surprising that a party like AAP, with a strong social media back-up has had to face up to public relations faux pas like the recent Kejriwal, Bhushan disagreement.

Because like the BJP made evident this time, any small difference in opinion within the AAP will be played up by the Opposition to hint at an unstable party and hence an equally unreliable government. With the AAP facing a fair share of apprehension about its policies and its efficacy, it is probably better advised to decide on a bunch of spokerpersons who speak to the media after an internal consultation.

It is important to note here that following the AAP's win, while leaders like Yogendra Yadav have been constantly seen making media appearances, with members like Kumar Vishwas stepping in, in his absence, Bhushan seems to be on a media hiatus. With the odds facing the AAP stacking up, it is probably high time the AAP come up with a strong public relations policy that will save the party further embarrassment.

 


Why AAP can’t afford a Prashant Bhushan pulling a Digvijaya on the party

From the Gandhi topis to the profuse use of the words 'aam aadmi' in every sentence they utter, Arvind Kejriwal's AAP leaders have laboriously tried to sound like carbon copies of each other in its short existence. However, with the party coming to power in Delhi, slowly, it is starting to sound more like a political party, as opposed to a students' movement where every participant says the same things in shrill, fervent tones. Given that the power dynamics of the party were fraught with problems right at its inception, it was just a matter of time before differences in opinions started surfacing. When Arvind Kejriwal and his band of supporters moved away from the power centre that was Anna Hazare in the anti-corruption stir, the founding leaders of the AAP came across as one nucleus, out to chart its own course.

And soon after, possibly because Kejriwal was the relentless voice of them all and was also more visible to people thanks to his fasting stint with Anna, he emerged as the most recognised, media-savvy leader who could be the face of the Aam Aadmi Party. However, while Kejriwal's role in the party can not be undermined, it is true that the logistics of running a political party demands physical and intellectual inputs from more than just one person. While Kejriwal has never visibly tried to eclipse the public life of most of his close coterie of leaders, the latter have always routinely echoed what he had had to say on most issues. Except for Prashant Bhushan.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

Prashant Bhushan. Reuters.

A Supreme Court lawyer by profession, Bhushan was actively involved in the foundation building exercises of the AAP. One will recollect when AAP, led by Kejriwal, went on an 'expose' spree to herald its entry into politics, Bhushan was almost always the one fielding questions from the media alongside Kejriwal. From details about Nitin Gadkari's Purti Group to Robert Vadra's land deals, Bhushan was a prominent presence in all the public announcements of the AAP in its nascent stages. From giving out details of alleged scams, to appearing in television shows to counter the political bigwigs ranting about a new kid on the block, to following up the issues, Bhushan was the face of the AAP's activism days. In fact, the continuous string of exposes by the party led the Congress and BJP to turn the heat on Bhushan and accuse him of indulging in a shady land deal in his hometown in Himachal Pradesh.

However, with the party's upward swing in the political landscape of the country Bhushan, a member of the national executive of the party, seemed to take a step back from the limelight. Around the same time, some of his opinions on important national issues, failed to resonate with the rest of the party.

Right after the elections, while speculations were rife that AAP will seek the support of either the Congress or the BJP, AAP leaders put up a stoic face and went on a rumour rejection trip. However, it was reported that Bhushan had told the media that if the BJP meets AAP's conditions, the party was willing to support BJP. As the news leaked out, Arvind Kejriwal immediately announced that he didn't endorse Bhushan's view. In fact, he dismissed what Bhushan said that the latter's personal opinion. More recently, Bhushan declared that there should be a referendum on the Kashmir issue. As the BJP pounced on the opportunity declaring Bhushan anti-national, Kejriwal, once again distanced himself from the comment conveying that Bhushan's view was not essentially the party's view.

While it is completely understandable if two members of a political party have conflicting views on the same subject, the problem with AAP is, unlike say a Congress, it cannot afford to have a leader on the lines of Digvijaya Singh, whose hurried comments the party is left covering up for. It is possibly true that leaders expressing contrary opinions within a party helps a party, especially a young one like AAP, develop its politics and deepen its impact. At the same time, however, the party can't falter on its public relations strategies. In fact, it is no short of surprising that a party like AAP, with a strong social media back-up has had to face up to public relations faux pas like the recent Kejriwal, Bhushan disagreement.

Because like the BJP made evident this time, any small difference in opinion within the AAP will be played up by the Opposition to hint at an unstable party and hence an equally unreliable government. With the AAP facing a fair share of apprehension about its policies and its efficacy, it is probably better advised to decide on a bunch of spokerpersons who speak to the media after an internal consultation.

It is important to note here that following the AAP's win, while leaders like Yogendra Yadav have been constantly seen making media appearances, with members like Kumar Vishwas stepping in, in his absence, Bhushan seems to be on a media hiatus. With the odds facing the AAP stacking up, it is probably high time the AAP come up with a strong public relations policy that will save the party further embarrassment.

 


The Aam vs Khaas Aadmi: How AAP redefined us vs them

by Shalini Gupta

The term "aam aadmi" has been used in common Hindi parlance for a long time to refer to the common man. But never before has this term been used with such frequency and passion as in the past year as the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) was launched in November, 2012. One can almost claim that the AAP has copyrighted this commonly used phrase - "aam aadmi".

Born out of the frustration that the common citizen felt at being marginalized in Indian politics, AAP channelled the anger of the "aam aadmi" to overthrow a corrupt political system in Delhi. On 28 December, AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal was sworn in as the youngest Chief Minister of Delhi.

The oath taking ceremony took place at the Ramlila Maidan, where the aam aadmi's anti-corruption battle first started with Anna Hazare's fast in 2011. This was the people's celebration, attended by over 2 lakh "aam aadmi" and "aam aurats" from all over Delhi and other States.

Has Kejriwal ceased to be an aam aadmi? PTI

Has Kejriwal ceased to be an aam aadmi? PTI

Promise of Simplicity

Arvind Kejriwal and his team of ministers arrived at the venue in the style of the "aam aadmi" using public transportation (metro). In his speech Kejriwal talked about his 17 promises to the citizens of Delhi. The first was to get rid of the VIP culture in politics. He renounced the lavish and opulent lifestyles enjoyed by most political leaders in India like red beacon cars, extra security, opulent bungalows for himself and his MLAs, and he promised to live simply as an aam aadmi and serve the people.

An electorate that was furious with the pomp and splendour in the lives of its elected representatives, while common citizens struggled for even the most basic necessities like water and electricity, loved this gesture. It made AAP stand apart from all other political parties. This was in stark contrast to reports of ministers from one state or another making lavish trips abroad that masqueraded as "study leaves", at huge taxpayer expense.

Who is the Aam Aadmi?

The "aam aadmi" was in power for the first time in India's political history. He wanted to change the system, he needed to get into power to do that, and now he was in. Did that now make him a "khaas aadmi"?

To answer this question, let's examine the definition of "aam" and "khaas" aadmi. For most people, the term "aam aadmi" refers to the common man, the average citizen. The line that separates the "aam" and "khaas" distinguishes the "many" from the "few". Some further associate this term with class or income status. "Aam aadmi" describes the economic status of the majority of the population. What is the income level for the cut-off? What other characteristics fit this profile? Type of housing? Would you stop being an "aam aadmi" if you moved up the income profile or type of housing? People using purely economic criterion to define the "aam aadmi" would say yes.

What criterion other than economic status is used to distinguish the "aam" from "khaas", the "many" from the "few", the "common" from the uncommon"? Can power, prestige, or even personal characteristics be used? .

Khaas Aadmi in Aam Aadmi Party

With AAP's growing popularity across the country, many prominent and successful individuals from industry and politics are leaving high profile jobs to join the party. Some AAP supporters have created a hue and cry about opening the door for such people, whom they perceive as "khaas aadmi".

According to them, this party is the exclusive domain of the common man. If you are a successful person, you cannot be an "aam aadmi" because an "aam aadmi" is not successful. If you are a prominent person you cannot be an "aam aadmi" because an "aam aadmi" is not famous.

Desirable personal characteristics that are relatively rare, harder to achieve and therefore uncommon, can also fall in this category. Some people define the "khaas aadmi" as that person who has certain personal characteristics that are extremely rare.

Recently, Arvind Kejriwal has thrown a new twist in this definition. In his speech in the Delhi assembly, he said that whoever is clean and supports anti-corruption is an "aam aadmi", and those that support corruption are "khaas aadmi". Assuming that most people are clean and not corrupt, this definition does separate the "many" from the "few". However, it creates a new dilemma. Typically we have defined "khaas" as that which is more desirable and exalted.

Kejriwal's new definition of "khaas aadmi" flips that notion on its head. But it does address the concerns of the wealthy, successful and prominent, who may have wondered if there was space for them in this new party of aam aadmis. Kejriwal invites them in so long as they are clean and support the AAP agenda.

Living like Aam Aadmi

In the midst of this continuing debate of the common and the uncommon, another controversy erupted when media reported that Arvind Kejriwal would be shifting his residence to a five bedroom flat in Delhi. The Opposition accused AAP of moving away from their promise of simplicity.

Kejriwal said in his defence that he had not gone back on any promise. AAP had promised that its elected representatives would not take any government housing if they had their own residence in Delhi. Since Kejriwal does not have his own house in Delhi, he was entitled to take a government house. Moreover, the flat he was getting on a 500 sq. yards plot was far less luxurious than the posh Lutyens bungalow on a sprawling 3 acre plot (15000 sq. yards) that the previous chief minister Sheila Dixit lived in.

Now the million dollar question is, what type of housing would be classified as "aam aadmi" housing? When Kejriwal lived in a 4-bedroom government flat he was admired for living in simplicity and with austerity. The proposed move to a 5 bedroom flat was attacked as reneging on his promise. Does the addition of one extra bedroom take you over the threshold from need to luxury? To put this matter to rest, Kejriwal has asked the government to look for a smaller house. The question remains, what size flat would be perceived as suitable for an "aam aadmi" Chief Minister and allow him to fulfil his obligations with speed and efficiency?

Inner Tension: Aam Aadmi vs. Khaas Aadmi

Exploring the aam/khaas dilemma one wonders, who do people admire more? Does the "aam aadmi" only relate to and admire "another aam aadmi" or is the opposite sometimes true? Else, how would you explain the fascination with film stars, the highly successful and the very rich? How come there are magazines that focus on the lives of the rich and famous that are read by millions of people? How would you explain the rush to get the autographs or photographs of such people?

On further rumination one also questions, who do people want to be like? Do not most people desire to stand out from the crowd, to be exceptional, in other words, to become a "khaas aadmi"? One could say that his is a pervasive human need.

This is what motivates people to climb mountains, earn Olympic medals and win awards. This tension exists in all of us. On the one hand we love the "aam aadmi", people who are like us, and we can relate to. On the other hand we look up to and admire the "khaas aadmi" who evokes in us admiration, and a desire to want to be like them. This is a basic existential tension that pulls us in opposite directions.

Little wonder that we get confused on how to react to an "aam aadmi" like Arvind Kejriwal. For many admirers, he was a "khaas aadmi" even before he became the Chief Minister of Delhi. For them, the yardstick that differentiates "aam" and "khaas" is not wealth or power, but personal characteristics. For them, Kejriwal's competence, integrity and spirit of service made him stand apart from others. Others who use power as a yardstick for differentiation, would classify him as a "khaas aadmi" now that he has official power. However, many supporters would maintain that his simplicity and down to earth mannerisms will always make him an "aam aadmi" to them, whether he lives in a 3, 4 or 5 bedroom flat.

The debate on who is an "aam aadmi" will continue, as people will use different criteria to make that distinction. Economic status, prominence, success, power or even personal characteristics can be used to draw the line. In addition, there will always be an internal ambivalence in people, a tension that pulls them in opposite directions, draws them to the "aam" and the "khaas", simultaneously.

Shalini Gupta is an Organization Development Consultant in Chicago, and is the coordinator of the AAP Global NRI supporter group.


How AAP can change the dynamics of coalition politics

The dynamics of coalition politics in the country is set for a change. The agent of this change is going to be the Aam Aadmi Party, that Black Swan in Indian politics. The outlier has shaken up the political establishment already, its impact would magnify once the party becomes a full-fledged player in national politics. The party may contest the Lok Sabha polls in 20 states or in about 300 seats across the country. It may not be a runaway success by way of winning seats—AAP sources expect a modest haul of 30-40—but it promises to alter the rather set template of coalition calculations and the mix-and-match process.

How? Let's begin with the big parties, the Congress and the BJP, which anchor the UPA and the NDA respectively. The Congress, after concluding that coalitions were a temporary phenomenon and vehemently dismissing the idea of sharing power with other parties at its Panchmarhi conclave in 1998, did a U-turn on its position rather quickly. The shift helped the party return to political reckoning in 2004. It went on to form the government as the head of the UPA. After the UPA won a second time in 2009, the Congress was convinced that it had broken the coalition code and the principal rival, the BJP, had little chance of beating it.

AAP volunteers. AFP

AAP volunteers. AFP

The party was certain that it has managed to create a political eco-system which would make it difficult for the BJP to find allies to form a government. Even if its own tally dipped significantly, the eco-system would ensure that the Congress would never be too away from power. It did not matter if it did not a have strong leadership or credibility to rule. That's the reason the party had been so dismissive of Narendra Modi or the issue of corruption or the protest on the streets. Nothing mattered so long as the arithmetic worked fine. It was conviction that bordered on over-confidence.

The 'Congress system'—that is how BJP president Rajnath Singh would put it—placed the BJP in a position of disadvantage. With hardly any presence in the South and the East and votes in electorally crucial Uttar Pradesh and Bihar potentially divided among four strong claimants, the party could expect around 180 seats if it performed to the best of its ability. Finding allies to secure at least 92 more seats to form the government was a near impossible task. But in a way, that was also an advantage. The party knew its enemy and its own shortcomings, and understood how to go about it. It unleashed Modi to capitalize on the prevailing mood of discontent in the country and win over the middle class, the youth and the micro constituencies.

It was an experiment that appeared fool-proof. Modi has managed to create a small wave in favour of the BJP. However, just as he appeared set to deliver the impossible for the party—about 200 seats and allies—comes the AAP. The latter threatens to take away a major chunk of the youth-middle class votes cultivated assiduously by the BJP's prime ministerial candidate – if Delhi results were not proof enough, the huge interest in the membership drive of the party across the stats should suffice. If the AAP manages to run a successful campaign before the elections, it might end up pulling down the seat tally of the later. A loss of 20 seats may make a huge difference to the prospects of the BJP.

The Congress, of course, is the bigger loser. There is a strong chance of its support base gravitating to the AAP in many states. The new outfit is similar to it ideological agenda and it offers fresh leadership. Once the AAP gets a toe hold in the states where Congress has good presence but is virtually defunct as a political unit, its recovery would be impossible. No matter what Rahul Gandhi does to re-energise the party, a lost vote base is never easy to recover. If AAP manages to bring the Congress tally down to the sub-80s region or worse, it would effectively destroy the latter's coalition game plan. Its position as the anchor of the UPA coalition would be no more tenable.

With big parties far away from the majority mark, it becomes an open game. Many parties, particularly the Left ones and others with no special liking for the Congress and the BJP might veer towards pushing the AAP to the leadership role. Admitted, it's a long shot, but in a situation where everything is in a flux no possibility can be ruled out. Even if we leave out this possibility, there can be no denying that with 20 seats—let's keep the seats on the lower side—the AAP would still be one of the bigger parties in Parliament and will be in a position to influence many decisions.

In short, the AAP might change the nature of coalition equations in the country. Let's keep our fingers crossed.


Chouhan won for lack of alternative, Madhya Pradesh BJP now rattled by AAP

With the unexpected success  of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Delhi, Arvind Kejriwal has put self-doubt in the minds of rival politicians. Now, with AAP throwing its hat in the ring in Madhya Pradesh too, the scenario is suddenly drastically changed.

Bipolar states such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand in the Hindi heartland would avidly watch the AAP progress during the Lok Sabha elections in April.

Kejriwal-CM-office-PTI

Kejriwal in the office of the CM. PTI

It was for want of a strong alternative that Madhya Pradesh just handed the BJP a third term. But the BJP's euphoria has subsided considerably after AAP announced its plans for the General elections. Even with no more than a fledgling organisational structure, AAP's Madhya Pradesh unit is flooded with membership applications. Former state chief secretary S C Behar is among the prominent new entrants in the Aam Aadmi Party here. The party may also rope in another former senior bureaucrat, M N Buch, and former director general of police Arun Gurtoo.

AAP recently marked its presence in the state with the arrest of its six workers who protested against chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan keeping two government bungalows for his use. The very issue which the BJP exploited against the AAP chief minister in Delhi recoiled on it in Madhya Pradesh.

AAP has also effectively exploited the scandal involving the professional examination board that continues to embarrass the BJP. Hundreds of candidates have passed different professional examinations with the connivance of bureaucrats, ministers and other BJP supporters to earn government jobs. The money that changed hands in bribes runs into several hundred crore rupees. The Congress failed to pin down the government on this issue. With the Scindia and Digvijay Singh factions slugging it out, the Congress's popularity ratings continue to drop. And AAP is the natural beneficiary. The party is also counting a large share of over six lakh NOTA (None Of The Above) votes that were cast during the Assembly elections.

Senior BJP leaders avoid discussing the AAP phenomenon in public. Former chief minister Kailash Joshi said the AAP influence in the state can't be denied outright, but his party would like to wait and watch.

The RSS has, however, cautioned its members against the growing threat without naming it. Sangh Supremo Mohan Bhagwat who addressed the workers' sankalp mahashivir (resolution camp) that concluded on Sunday at Jabalpur said they had forsaken austerity after the BJP came to power in some states. He said some Sangh members abused their position in the political organisation and even sabotaged the party candidate's election.
With the BJP's prospects of regaining power at the Centre brightening, it had become fashionable to join the RSS, said Bhagwat. But, he said, the new entrants lacked conviction. By just reverting to the agenda of austerity, some parties could overtake the BJP, he said, apparently referring to AAP. Bhagwat also cautioned Sangh workers against jostling to take credit for the BJP's success.

There is a raging debate on who should get the credit for the party's performance in the Assembly elections, the star campaigner Narendra Modi or Chief Minister Chouhan, who gamely shouldered the failures of a vulnerable team of ministers.

Now in his third straight term Chouhan shows firmness of demeanour and tone. He has already warned the bureaucracy of "zero tolerance" against corruption and has asked his ministers to draw up a 100-day action plan for departments. The clear refrain is: perform or perish.

Most ministers seen as performers during Chouhan's earlier tenure are ironically out of the team. Some are booked for corruption, some were rejected by the electorate and a few others were denied party nomination. Chouhan's repeated warnings on corruption sound hollow as there is no effort to pursue the cases pending with the Lokayukta against former ministers and senior bureaucrats.

For the entire clamour for clean politics the state has witnessed a six per cent rise in the number of MLAs facing criminal charges compared to figures of the 2008 elections.

The National Election Watch (NEW) and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) said that out of 71 MLAs with criminal records, 48 MLAs are from the BJP and 23 from Congress.

 


Bhushan’s view on Jammu Kashmir referendum is his own, says Kejriwal

After fellow party leader Prashant Bhushan sparked a controversy with his comments on the removal of army forces from Kashmir, Aam Aadmi Party Arvind Kejriwal today said he didn't agree that there needed to be a referendum in the state.

"We dont agree with what Prashant Bhushan said about Kashmir, it's his personal view," Arvind Kejriwal told reporters in Delhi.

We cannot have a referendum on Kashmir, but we must respect sentiments of Kashmiri people, he said.

Not on the same page on Kashmir? File image. PTI

Not on the same page on Kashmir? File image. PTI

The AAP leader's comments come in light of his party colleague seeking a referendum on the presence of the Army and the removal of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA).

"It is very important for us to win the hearts and minds of the people and prevent alienation. For that, the first thing which needs to be done is to remove AFSPA, which gives Army immunity in human rights violations," Bhushan said in an interview to a TV channel.

Bhushan, however, seemed to have moderated his earlier stand which had him reportedly favouring the separation of Kashmir if that was what was wanted by the people of the state.

He instead said that the separation of Kashmir Valley would be against the Indian Constitution and added that it may also cause harm to minorities like Kashmiri Pandits and Sikhs who inhabit the state.

"Allowing the separation of Kashmir may lead to a problem where you have a separate state where minority rights are not protected by the constitution... Indian constitution protects minority rights," he said.

with PTI inputs


AAP targeting Rahul Gandhi? To hold rally in Amethi

Amethi: The Aam Aadmi Party, which is poised to contest Lok Sabha poll from Congress' bastion of Amethi, is organising a grand rally in Amethi on 12 January.

Congress VP Rahul Gandhi and AAP leader Kumar Vishwas.

Congress VP Rahul Gandhi and AAP leader Kumar Vishwas.

Preparations have begun for the rally in which Kumar Vishwas, probable party nominee pitted against Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi from the seat, will participate along with other party members.

Local district convener of AAP, Hanuman Singh, said that preparations are on with youth lending support in a big way.

He claimed that AAP rally would mark the beginning of the end of Nehru-Gandhi dynasty politics here and hand over the reins of power to the common man.

People facing problems of unemployment and other local issues are looking forward to a change and AAP would provide them an alternative, Singh added.

PTI


National security cannot be decided by referendum: Jaitley on J-K

New Delhi: Strongly opposing AAP leader Prashant Bhushan's suggestion on deployment of armed forces in Kashmir with the consent of people, BJP on Monday hit out at his party for taking a "weak" stand on national security issues and said these cannot be decided by populism or referendum.

Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley. AFP

Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley. AFP

Stating that it was "regrettable" that a party with national ambitions was adopting a position similar to that of Pakistan and the separatists that was hostile to India's interests, Arun Jaitley hoped that sensible elements in AAP will seek to reverse this "soft" stand, otherwise "the slope downwards will be faster than the movement upwards".

"The issues of national security cannot be decided by populism or referendum. They can only be decided on security considerations. Till such time the infrastructure of terror remains, the presence of the army in Jammu & Kashmir is essential," the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha said.

Lashing out at the Aam Aadmi Party, he said, "It is Pakistan which has been suggesting the de-militarisation of the Valley. Some separatist groups have been echoing that demand. It is regrettable that for a party like the Aam Aadmi Party which nourishes national ambitions, should adopt a position hostile to India's interests," Jaitley said.

AAP leader Prashant Bhushan had on Sunday suggested that the issue of army presence in the Kashmir Valley may be decided by a referendum of the people in the Valley.

The BJP leader pointed out that the same leader had two years ago suggested a plebiscite in Jammu & Kashmir where people must be free to decide whether they wish to stay with India or otherwise.

Jaitley's remarks came even as Aam Aadmi Party leader and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal today distanced from the views of Bhushan saying decisions on internal security are taken based on the law and order situation and there cannot have referendum on deployment of the army in Kashmir.

PTI


AAP may be heading towards same old toxic policies on quotas

With every passing day, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is beginning to look like any other party – if one were to take the simple halo of anti-corruption away from it.

Senior AAP leader Yogendra Yadav. PTI

Senior AAP leader Yogendra Yadav. PTI

Let's forget the initial freebies on water and power as unavoidable since these promises were made when AAP did not see itself as a likely contender for power. But now that everyone and his aunt is predicting a bright future for AAP not only in Delhi but in the national elections a few months down the line, shouldn't AAP intellectuals be spending more time formulating sensible policies that at least look different?

The Economic Times today published an interview with Yogendra Yadav where he says AAP will be looking at an extension of reservations for the disadvantaged sections of society.

He could not have said it more bluntly. "We will work for more reservation for disadvantaged groups. Discrimination on the basis of caste is extreme in India. Equally worse is discrimination based on gender and class. We will work towards the welfare of all groups that are victim to such discrimination."

How is this any different from what the mainstream national and regional parties do – which is about promising reservations to various groups in the name of backwardness?

His statement to ET is also at variance with an earlier interview to the The Indian Express, where he said AAP would be "deeply suspicious of radical ideologies of the 20th century."

Among other things, he had said that AAP would try and transcend the Left-Right categorisation or even try to occupy the middle ground - like the Congress party. In fact, he went so far as to claim that "the Right cannot have a viable politics here and the Left did not have an intelligent economics."

But is speaking about extending the ambit of reservations a new way of thinking about old problems?  And is this any way to keep on attracting the hordes of fresh faces now heading towards the AAP.

The main attraction of AAP for middle class professionals is that it is an equal opportunity party with no glass ceiling and with no pre-conceived notions on how to create inclusiveness.

In fact, the rush of talented individuals to AAP is directly related to the fact that its approaches will mark a break with the usual. AAP is believed to offer a meritocratic option to those who otherwise feel excluded and alienated from the political process.

In the recent Delhi election, AAP is said to have got 29 percent of the Dalit vote even without promising all kinds of reservations. Mayawati's BSP received a mauling despite masquerading as the prima donna of reservations and quotas.

If Dalits voted for AAP in significant numbers without thinking caste and reservations, what is Yadav's logic of now extending the idea further? Can inclusiveness not be achieved without quotas?

Maybe, AAP will not carry out the idea of reservations too far, but if it does, it will be a big downer for the very people who now see hope in AAP.

It will be betraying the people now rushing towards the party.

What India needs is not more quotas, but making affirmative action more effective by investing in skill-building and mentoring. In his last stint as Chairman of Infosys, NR Narayana Murthy proved the efficacy of this approach by actual practice. A 2006 Business Standard report quoted him as saying: "Last year, we chose 65 candidates from the disadvantaged sections and put them under intensive training. Subsequently, they were subjected to recruitment tests at Infosys. As many as 35 qualified for jobs at our BPO arm Progeon. This should be the approach."

Isn't this what a brand-new party like AAP be trying instead of opting for the same old route of reservations?


Bhushan’s view on Kashmir referendum is his own, says Kejriwal

After fellow party leader Prashant Bhushan sparked a controversy with his comments on the removal of army forces from Kashmir, Aam Aadmi Party Arvind Kejriwal today said he didn't agree that there needed to be a referendum in the state.

"We dont agree with what Prashant Bhushan said about Kashmir, it's his personal view," Arvind Kejriwal told reporters in Delhi.

We cannot have a referendum on Kashmir, but we must respect sentiments of Kashmiri people, he said.

Not on the same page on Kashmir? File image. PTI

Not on the same page on Kashmir? File image. PTI

The AAP leader's comments come in light of his party colleague seeking a referendum on the presence of the Army and the removal of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA).

"It is very important for us to win the hearts and minds of the people and prevent alienation. For that, the first thing which needs to be done is to remove AFSPA, which gives Army immunity in human rights violations," Bhushan said in an interview to a TV channel.

Bhushan, however, seemed to have moderated his earlier stand which had him reportedly favouring the separation of Kashmir if that was what was wanted by the people of the state.

He instead said that the separation of Kashmir Valley would be against the Indian Constitution and added that it may also cause harm to minorities like Kashmiri Pandits and Sikhs who inhabit the state.

"Allowing the separation of Kashmir may lead to a problem where you have a separate state where minority rights are not protected by the constitution... Indian constitution protects minority rights," he said.

with PTI inputs


AAP distances itself from Bhushan’s comments on Kashmir referendum

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party today distanced itself from the views of its senior leader Prashant Bhushan that a referendum should be carried out in Kashmir to decide on deployment of the army to deal with security threats in the Valley.

Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said decisions on internal security are taken based on the law and order situation and there cannot have referendum on deployment of the army in Kashmir.

Arvind Kejriwal

Arvind Kejriwal

"Deployment of the army within the country should be decided on the basis of internal security threat. There is no question of a referrundum on this. But we believe the sentiments of locals should be respected. Otherwise democracy will be under threat," he told reporters when asked about Bhushan's comments on the issue yesterday.

He said, "AAP does not support referendum on such issues."

Bhushan had said a referendum should be carried out in Kashmir to decide on deployment of the army to deal with internal security threats in the Valley.

He had also batted for lifting of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) in J-K, saying it gave the army immunity in cases of human rights violation while causing alienation among the people.

"It is very important for us to win the hearts and minds of the people and prevent alienation. For that, the first thing which needs to be done is to remove AFSPA, which gives the army immunity in (cases of) human rights violations," Bhushan had told a TV channel.

The army's deployment for internal security purposes should be effected only with the consent of the people, except
in cases where the rights of minorities need to be protected, he had said.

In 2011, Bhushan had triggered a controversy by supporting the idea of holding a plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir.

PTI