Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Jan Lokpal Bill: Cong preparing ground for AAP-Centre showdown?

After a series of half-hearted attacks on the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, the Congress party has for the first time raised the bogey of not supporting the government if it does not get the Lieutenant Governor's approval for the Delhi Jan Lokpal Bill before introducing in the Assembly. The Congress party is providing outside support to AAP's minority government.

upporters of social activist Anna Hazare burning the copies of the government's version of the Lokpal bill during a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. PTI imaeg

Supporters of social activist Anna Hazare burning the copies of the government's version of the Lokpal bill during a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. PTI imaeg

The Delhi Government, which has called for a four-day special assembly session to pass the Jan Lokpal Bill, the final draft of which was cleared by the Cabinet on Monday, has decided to give the go-by to the practice of first getting the draft bill okayed by LG (who is the Centre's representative in the state) before it is introduced in the Assembly. The Delhi government has said that the Jan Lokpal bill will be directly introduced in the Assembly and not sent to the Centre for its approval.

The Congress party is now up in arms vowing not to support any bill that is 'illegal'. Introducing a bill in the Assembly without the permission of the LG, says Congress, is a violation of Transaction of Business rules.

Not one to miss an opportunity to take the moral high ground, AAP's response to the Congress party's threat of not supporting the bill has been along expected lines: "What can be expected from a party that has delayed bringing Lokpal for 40 years," said Education Minister Manish Sisodia when asked about the Congress decision not to support the bill.

Any opposition to the Jan Lokpal Bill is bound to be exploited by AAP to its political advantage. For a party that grew out of an anti-corruption movement, there couldn't be a more fitting issue over which to be brought down. And so while Congress may use the 'illegal' procedure argument for not supporting the bill, it knows that AAP would gladly play the martyr and use every opportunity to blame the Congress for bill not going through.

At the same, the party doesn't want to be rolling out the red carpet for the AAP government to turn the passage of the Jan Lokpal Bill into a massive public event ahead of the Lok Sabha elections.

"We are not against the Lokpal bill. We are not saying that we don't support the bill. But the manner in which the bill is being brought, it looks as if Kejriwal does not want to pass the bill, but only fool the people into thinking that he does. If the bill is brought illegally, how can it be passed," said a Congress MLA.

Refusing to be drawn into questions on the political implications of such a move, the MLA said, "They cannot introduce the bill. Whether the government falls or stays, the Congress is not worried. We will not do illegal things."

But even as the Congress appears to digging in its heels over the Jan Lokpal Bill, it is already preparing to shift the problem elsewhere by forcing the Centre to take on the Delhi government over its refusal to gets the LG's nod before introducing the bill in the Assembly.

Choosing to lay the problem at the LG's door, like it did during the Somnath Bharti controversy, when it did not make any demands on government directly but asked the LG to ensure that law took its course, the Delhi Congress has said that it "will submit a memorandum to the LG on the unconstitutional Jan Lokpal Bill, which has been brought to create a political drama."

The Congress party chief Arvinder Singh Lovely told reporters on Tuesday said he "would request the governor to stop the AAP government from introducing the bill." Ever ready for a confrontation, the AAP government has so far shown no signs of backing down from its stand of sending the bill directly to the Assembly. Having already taken on the Centre over the Delhi Police and had its way, the Kejriwal-led government seems to be preparing for yet another show-down with the Centre.


Nitish blasts minister for blaming UP, Bihar migrants for Guj poverty

Patna: Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar today took an indirect dig at Narendra Modi for remarks of a Gujarat minister linking migration from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh to surge in the number of poor in state over the last decade.

"I wonder what type of government will come up at the Centre... Such comments were heard in Maharashtra but now they have started coming from Gujarat," Kumar said in his reaction to Gujarat Finance Minister Nitin Patel's remarks blaming migrants from Bihar and UP for the rise in number of poor families in the state.

Nitish Kumar. AFP image

Nitish Kumar. AFP image

Lambasting Patel for blaming the migrants from Bihar and UP for the rise in poverty figure in Gujarat in recent years, Kumar claimed that on contrary the economic development in both Gujarat and Maharashtra have been made possible because of the hard work of migrants from the two hinterland states.

He denied that migrants from the two states were not responsible for poverty in Gujarat or Maharashtra. Patel had yesterday said that the number of people coming under BPL criterion has gone up in Gujarat due to migration from other states.

Meanwhile, senior BJP leader and former deputy Chief Minister of Bihar Sushil Kumar Modi came to Patel's rescue and said that the Gujarat minister's comments were twisted out of context.

Patel never meant to say that the migrants from Bihar were responsible for the rise in the number of BPL cardholders in Gujarat, Modi claimed.

The Gujarat minister was merely replying to a question where he was asked whether migrant labourers from Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha have been issued BPL cards upon their stay for works. Patel in his reply had said that it was true, Modi said.

The former deputy chief minister said that more than ten lakh migrant labourers from Bihar were working in industrial units of Gujarat and they were being treated with respect and given all the facilities.

He, however, alleged that Bihari migrants have been insulted and subjected to atrocities in Congress-ruled states like Maharashtra and Assam and because of that many were forced to shift to other states.

PTI


Antony’s statement on AugustaWestland very curious: BJP

New Delhi: BJP today termed Defence Minister AK Antony's statement in Rajya Sabha on AugustaWestland issue as "very curious" and alleged it "conceals more than it reveals" as the government has not flatly denied the allegations made by middlemen in the VVIP chopper deal.

The opposition party also questioned if there was any "match-fixing" going on in Italy after India's Defence Ministry and CBI had joined the hearings in the case there.

AK Antony. AFP

AK Antony. AFP

"Today's statement of the Defence Minister is very curious...The statement of the Defence Minister conceals more than it reveals before Parliament," BJP's deputy leader in Rajya Sabha Ravishankar Prasad said.

Asking the Defence Minister why he did not flatly deny the allegations by middleman Christian Michel as baseless and instead said the authenticity of certain notes by middlemen in the VVIP chopper deal in trying to target certain Indian leaders were "not proved".

"Why cannot the government of India so flatly deny that the allegations made are completely baseless...It could have been denied straight away and upfront.

"In the statement of the Defence Minister, why is there no categroical denial that all the statement of Michel Christian which has been elaborately reported in newspaper as Sonia Gandhi being the driving force," he said.

Expressing surprise at Guido Hashcke's statements on trial on the deal in Italy, Prasad said, "it is very surprising that Hashcke is explaining 'FAM' as Tyagi brothers and Hashke are not able to explain what does 'AP' mean.

"Therefore, someone somewhere...attempts are being made to influence witnesses also is our apprehension in view of the surrounding circumstances", he added.

Questioning the role of Defence Ministry and CBI in joining the case as an affected party in Italy, the BJP leader said, "how is it and why is it that Hashcke is explaining family. Is there any match-fixing going on in Italy that Defence Ministry and CBI have joined the hearing in Italy?"

BJP also questioned the government's role in not allowing the Income Tax to investigate the AugustaWestland deal and CAG to complete its audit.

"All these suspicious circumstances only reinforce the apprehensions that I am expressing," Prasad said.

Defence Minister AK Antony today said in Rajya Sabha that certain notes have come to light suggesting that middlemen in the VVIP chopper deal were trying to target certain Indian leaders but their authenticity is "not proved".

PTI


Communal Violence Bill doesn’t give power to govt: Kapil Sibal

New Delhi: Even as the Opposition today scuttled introduction of the controversial communal violence prevention bill in Rajya Sabha contending it violates federalism, Law Minister Kapil Sibal said the legislation has no provision which gives power to the Centre.

"We have drafted the Communal Violence Bill very carefully. There is no provision in it which gives power to the central government," Sibal tweeted.

Kapil Sibal. Reuters

Kapil Sibal. Reuters

He also said that to preserve the federal structure, "Sec 30 of the Communal Violence Bill includes state govt concurrence before any action by the NHRC."

His tweets on the bill came after Deputy Chairman PJ Kurien ruled that the Prevention of Communal Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2014 stands deferred in view of the "mood of the House" after the move was opposed by BJP, CPI-M, AIADMK, DMK and SP.

Before the deferment, the House saw an animated brief debate on whether Parliament had the jurisdiction to enact such a bill with Sibal and Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley, both noted lawyers, sparring on the issue.

Jaitley contended Parliament has no legislative competence to enact such a law and it will violate the spirit of federalism.

Countering him, Sibal insisted the federal structure was not being violated and any Central action under the bill would be with the consent of the state government.

Raking up the 2002 Gujarat riots issue, he said such a bill was necessary for central intervention in the event of "state-sponsored communal activity...it is like it happened in Gujarat".

PTI


BJP, AIUDF in unholy alliance for Rajya Sabha polls: Gogoi

Guwahati: The Congress today slammed opposition BJP and AIUDF "of forming an unholy alliance" to defeat a ruling party candidate in the upcoming Rajya Sabha election this week.

The party also claimed that the "result" of the election will be known tomorrow after the meetings of MLAs of respective parties as "some members from some parties are likely to abstain".

"For capturing power, BJP has started all kind of politicking. They have formed an unholy alliance with AIUDF for the Rajya Sabha poll. (Though) Both parties talk against each other in public, they have a secret understanding," Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi told reporters in Guwahati.

Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi. PTI

Assam Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi. PTI

Because of this 'alliance', the Congress has got a golden opportunity to expose both parties during Lok Sabha polls, he added.

For the three seats in Rajya Sabha from Assam that will become vacant in April, Congress has fielded sitting Rajya Sabha member Bhubaneshwar Kalita and Lok Sabha member from Sultanpur in Uttar Pradesh Sanjay Sinh, while the party's ally in the state BPF's Biswajit Daimary has filed nomination for the Upper House.

Opposition parties BJP, AGP and AIUDF are jointly supporting the independent candidate Haidar Hussain.

Talking about the poll, Assam Education, Health and Family Welfare Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said, "BJP, AGP and AIUDF have jointly put up a candidate at the cost of ideology. They have compromised on ideology."

Stating that Congress will not engage itself in any kind of "influencing tactics" or "horse trading" to secure MLAs' support for the election, he said the outcome will virtually be out by Thursday evening.

"Tomorrow every party will have their meetings regarding the election at 5 pm. So it will be clear, who will win or who will lose," Sarma said.

"Some members from some parties are likely to abstain. I hope that all the legislators of these three parties will not support this conflicting ideological alliance... If CP Joshi or the high command ask me to vote for BJP tomorrow, then I will not vote. I cannot compromise on my ideological front," he added.

Taking a dig at the media, Sarma alleged that the fourth pillar of democracy is triggering confusions between MLAs.

"Even if we meet for normal business, media terms it as a meeting for horse trading. Media is spoiling the relationship between the MLAs," he alleged.

Sarma further said Sinh will be Congress' first choice, making his win confirm.

"The rest of the votes will be divided equally between Kalita and Daimary," he added.

On opposition candidate Hussain, Sarma said he is mulling to file a defamation case against him because of his alleged demeaning remarks against all the MLAs of the state in a TV talk show.

He also said BJP does not have any moral right to talk about indigenous issue regarding Sinh's candidature as it itself fielded candidates across the country.

PTI


No gyan needed from Modi who did not spare his guru: Congress

New Delhi: Stung by his charge that Pranab Mukherjee was twice denied opportunity to become PM, Congress today reminded Narendra Modi of the "humiliating" treatment meted out to elders in BJP and said he was no one to give lessons as he "had not spared even his guru L K Advani".

Information and Broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said it was unfortunate that Modi had sought "to drag" the office of President into political discourse for scoring political brownie points.

Narendra Modi. AFP image

Narendra Modi. AFP image

"Instead of giving 'gyan' and lessons to Congress and others on how to respect elders, Modi should look within and even now correct himself after self-introspection," party spokesman Randeep Surjewala told the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate in a sharp retort.

Tewari said the President is a symbol of Indian state and is supposed to be above partisan politics - a decorum that has been maintained. "But unfortunately in Chief Minister of Gujarat, you see a tendency that to score political brownie points inorder to take a partisan potshot, he does not even spare the office of the President of India.

"I think its extremely unfortunate that the Chief Minister of Gujarat has sought to trample constitutional propriety by dragging the august office of the President of India into a political discourse," he told reporters here. Lamenting that Modi has levelled allegations against this nature on Gandhi family, Surjewala said that the President had been "one of the most experienced politicians in public life.

"Congress party has been enriched by his wisdom, years of experience and adminstrative acumen and he has served the Congress in many positions from senior most members of Congress Working Committee, general secretay and in several ministerial positions for decades working with Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Narasimha Rao, Sitaram Kesri and Sonia Gandhi."

Recalling how Modi treated Keshubhai Patel, Sanjay Joshi, Haren Pandya, Advani and "many others", he said that
the the Gujarat Chief Minister's remarks about Mukherjee's relationship with Congress reflects the "real nature of BJP's
self appointed PM candidate".

"Modi conveniently forgot Keshubhai Patel, who was not only one time Chief Minister of Gujarat but also one of the
most senior leaders. The manner in which Modi humiliated him and threw him out of not only Chief Ministerhsip but also BJP.

The way, he behaved with Harin Pandya is known to one and all. "The kind of treatment BJP and particularly Modi meted out to their senior leaders is also well-known.... Their patriarch and guru L K Advani had to resign from all party posts and go into hibernation (kop bhavan)," Surjewala said.

He said Modi's statement on Mukherjee is in line with his habit of ridiculing important individuals and posts and that
he had "not spared even his guru Advani".

Addressing a rally in Kolkata, Modi said Mukherjee was twice denied the opportunity to be the country's prime minister.

PTI


Nido Taniam killing: Be careful with language, says Brinda to Sushma

Ranchi:  CPI(M) Politburo member Brinda Karat today asked BJP leader Sushma Swaraj to be "much more careful" while expressing solidarity with any victim.

Sushma Swaraj. AFP image

Sushma Swaraj. AFP image

"When she (Swaraj) was speaking about the Nirbhaya case, she had described the rape victim as 'jinda lash (comatose)'. And now when she is again expressing solidarity with the Northeast people, she has used derogatory description (inadvertently)," Brinda said here.

"She has to be much more careful with her language," the she said while reacting to the Leader of the Opposition's reported unintentional choice of words while the Lok Sabha condemned the killing of Nido Taniam of Arunachal Pradesh in New Delhi.

PTI


Cong hopeful about passing Telangana Bill despite protests

New Delhi: Congress today voiced confidence that it will be able to settle Telanagana issue amicably and ensure passage of the bill for creation of the separate state even as pro and anti Telangana groups disrupted Parliament proceedings and clashed outside.

Party sources said that senior leaders Digvijay Singh and Jairam Ramesh are holding talks with both groups to defuse the tense situation and solve the issue amicably.

A file photo of protests against Telangana. PTI

A file photo of protests against Telangana. PTI

The leaders are also in touch with Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath to finalise the strategy before the bill for creation of Telangana is brought before Parliament next week.

At the AICC briefing, party spokesperson Randeep Surjewala said, "It's a emerging situation. It's an emotive issue and naturally emotions run high on both sides.

"I am confident that we will settle the issue amicably and as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said we will move forward.... I am hopeful that the bill will be passed."

His remarks came on a day when supporters of both Telangana and Seemandhra clashed with each other during a protest outside the Andhra Bhawan here in support of their demands.

Supporters from both sides held separate protests outside the Bhawan and raised slogans in support of their demands.

A clash soon broke out between the two sides but police quickly intervened to stop it.

The issue also rocked both Houses of Parliament today leading to adjournment of the Lok Sabha for the day and repeated adjournments of Rajya Sabha.

Both the Houses saw noisy scenes as soon as they met for the day with members from Andhra Pradesh -- from Telangana as well as Seemandhra regions -- cutting across party lines storming the Well. Those protesting included members from ruling Congress.

To questions about the possibility of BJP scuttling the passage of Telangana bill in Parliament to please its new possible ally TDP, a senior Congress leader said that let the BJP first "expose" itself on the separate statehood issue.

The leader also claimed that Congress has the required numbers in Parliament with support from other parties to see the legislation through.

PTI


Azad slams Modi over his remarks on Pranab Mukherjee

Bangalore: Senior Congress leader and Union Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad today hit back at BJP Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi for blaming the Gandhi family for twice denying the opportunity to Pranab Mukherjee to be the country's Prime Minister.

"What we do in our party is none of his (Modi's) concern," he told reporters on the sidelines of the 18th Convocation of National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences here.

Ghulam Nabi Azad. AFP

Ghulam Nabi Azad. AFP

Modi, at BJP's rally in Kolkata, had blamed the Gandhi family for twice denying the opportunity to Mukherjee to be the country's Prime Minister and urged people of Bengal not to forget this.

On the emergence of a Third Front ahead of Lok Sabha polls, Azad said all political parties enjoy the right to form a group.

"This is democracy. Every political party has the right to form a group and individuals join any other party. I can't say anything about the Third Front," he said.

Signalling emergence of a third front, eleven non-Congress and non-BJP parties today formally joined hands as a block in Parliament to pitch for pro-people, anti-communal and federal agenda.

PTI


Why Modi didn’t appeal to Mamata’s maa, maati, manush

Perhaps Narendra Modi finally tired of Mamata Banerjee's public snubs, because he tore into her government in West Bengal with an enthusiasm West Bengal's BJP cadre has not seen before.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

For a state that sent just one member to the Lok Sabha in 2009 (Jaswant Singh), Modi took a rather bold step in mocking Mamata. The state's 42 LS seats could be a critical gap for Modi's Mission 272.

"Give me all your seats," he told the gathered crowd, "and we will have a contest to see whether a BJP-led Central government does more for West Bengal or the state government."

The BJP is also completely absent in the state's Legislative Assembly. The 294-member Assembly is now dominated by the Trinamool Congress. In 2006, they contested 26 seats of these 294 and won none. In 2011, they contested all 294 seats. And again returned a zero-win result. In effect, the BJP is nearly non-existent in the West Bengal polity.

Given that Modi's Prime Ministerial dreams hinge on some extent on his performance in states where the BJP has no presence, the Gujarat CM may have been better advised had he remain patient. An opinion poll conducted by CSDS for the Lokniti-IBN poll tracker suggested that even compared to last year, a greater percentage of people approve of the present Trinamool Congress government in West Bengal.

Thirty nine percent of the respondents said that they prefer the current TMC government, as opposed to 30 percent who said that the Left government was better. And, of the people giving a thumbs up to the Mamata Banerjee government, 54 percent are Muslims. In fact, Muslim support for the TMC seems to have gone up in the recent past sharply -- just 39 percent of respondents who preferred the TMC government in 2013 were Muslims. That statistic is reason enough to suggest that wooing Mamata will be crucial for any party hoping to grab a sizeable number of Lok Sabha seats from West Bengal.

Doubtless, the BJP's popularity is on a slow rise, thanks mostly to apparent faith in Modi being the best man for the country's top job. The poll showed BJP's estimated vote share up to 14 percent now from 12 percent last year.

But the Trinamool Congress still has nearly triple the vote share, at 33 percent. There is a rider to that -- eighteen percent of the respondents believed that Narendra Modi was a better Prime Ministerial candidate than Mamata, who got eleven percent votes.  (Read more here)

Given that Mamata Banerjee has been a part of the NDA in the past and switching national allies has not really affected her political prospects at home before now, one would have expected her to join hands with BJP without batting an eyelid. She has to swallow quite a bit of her pride to go back to the Congress and the BJP could have been a great choice, but there is just one thing holding her back - and that is Modi and his reputation for being Muslim unfriendly to put it lightly.

Banerjee has always played to the galleries when it came to the Muslim vote bank and Modi is a risk she is probably not ready for. She has made sure Taslima Nasreen doesn't come back to Kolkata, she has given various sops to maulvis despite criticism and she has even not spoken up when Muslim fundamentalist organisations tried to disrupt a book launch which they alleged was anti-Muslim.

He suggested - and Mamata Banerjee will absolutely not be delighted to hear this -  that Muslims have been deliberately left out of the development drive in Bengal. Banerjee has probably taken all appeasing measures possible, including proposing reservations for jobs for Muslims, after she came to power in Bengal.

"We have a Haj quota of 3,800 and we get 37,000 applications. Bengal has a Haj quota of 12,000 and a bigger Muslim population than Gujarat, yet they get just 11,600 Haj applications. This shows that Muslims don't have enough money to travel to Haj. This also shows that they have not been included in the development race in the state."

Also, while Mamata has not vocally backed the idea of the Third Front, she has suggested forming a federal front - something Modi dismissed as a 'third rate' solution for the country's problems in his Kolkata rally. Again, Mamata might not indulge in the luxury of reading between the lines and categorising it as an attack on Mulayam Singh Yadav. She is most likely to take this as an attack on her politics and jeopardise BJP's chances of forming an alliance with TMC.

Then again, in his somewhat confused stance on the Trinamool Congress - where he at once derided the condition of the state and at the same time chose to not haul up Mamata vocally for her performance as CM - Modi then tried playing on Bengali pride so to say. Some one must have briefed him about Bengal's deep devotion to Sourav Ganguly and the state's cricket fans' grudge against national cricket bodies and stars like Sachin Tendulkar and Mahendra Singh Dhoni for the treatment meted out to their favourite cricketer.

Assuming that Bengal's voters possibly suffer from a persecution complex epidemic, Modi sought to comment on what is easily Congress' internal politics.  He first said, "You have placed Mamata ji in power for the state, you can put me at the Centre and there is Pranab da at the top anyway."

He then went on to remind his audience how Pranab Mukherjee was given a short shrift by Congress in the past and instead of choosing him as the PM candidate after Indira Gandhi was killed, Rajiv Gandhi was made the Prime Minister. "Again in 2004, Sonia Gandhi chose Manmohan Singh as the PM candidate and not Pranab Mukherjee," he said, his voice deep with remorse for Pranab Mukherjee's aborted political ambitions.

It's another thing that Bengal's Sourav Ganguly complex probably extends to its biryani, sweets and its literature - not so much its politicians.

Finally, Modi refused to touch any topic that is typical to Bengal or has had a bearing on the state's politics. From the contentious issue of land acquisition which had put CPI(M) in a spot to Mamata's stir against UPA's price hike - Modi scrupulously steered clear of topics that Bengal obsesses about. He did touch upon the state of industry - he said that industry is on a back foot -  but he neither mentioned what could be a possible remedy for it, nor did he enumerate the reasons why he thought Bengal's industry suffers. Possibly because, the current Bengal government's pro-farmer stance, which cost it the Tata Nano project, is something Modi is not ready to address yet.

Modi mentioned that agriculture is suffering in Bengal, though there are rivers abound in the state - one will remember he said exactly that in Bundelkhand, UP and a few other places too. Mamata rode to power from the great wave of support from rural Bengal - a part of Bengal which thrives on agriculture and saw Mamata'a anti-Tata move as one that is pro-agriculture. The same project which then found pride of place in Sanand, Gujarat. Did Modi effectively communicate with those voters who bear the largest chunk of Bengal's vote? No, he didn't.

He pointed out that while Bengal was the leader in the IT revolution that India saw, most other states left it behind within a short period of time. Apart from what is common knowledge, did he explain what ails the services industry in Bengal or what could possibly be a solution to its tribulations? No, he didn't.

He talked about electricity problems in Kolkata, which is fairly well-placed in terms of power supply. He spoke about unemployment, which as as much an problem of any other Indian state, as it is Bengal's. He neither spoke about the several hundreds of acres of land, which now lie in the Tata Motors' deserted plant and remains undeveloped and also out of reach of the farmers who owned them. Nor did he speak about the Maoist problems the state faced or the Gorkhaland stir that Mamata Banerjee very recently managed to stifle.

"Give me the responsibility of Bengal at the Centre," he exhorted. Did he give another reason, except for the Congress' failure, why? No.

Nostalgia and Tagore, a nice speech make. Only, it doesn't earn anyone votes.


Do the killers of Rajiv Gandhi deserve clemency?

(Editor's note: Even as the Supreme Court reserves judgement on whether to commute the death sentences of three persons convicted for Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, here's the story of what happened and the roles the three convicts played in his killing. This part needs to be read along with Who killed Rajiv Gandhi? Do they deserve clemency? Read this and Who killed Rajiv Gandhi? Filmmakers, read this .)

Rajiv arrived at the venue at 2210 hours. He garlanded Indira Gandhi's statue which was about 200 yards from the dais. He spent some minutes there. It was around 22.18 hours that he reached the red carpet area.

There was commotion as Rajiv arrived. He was mobbed by people wanting to garland him. Latha Kannan garlanded Rajiv and told him that her daughter had composed a poem in Hindi in his honour and asked him whether he would like to hear it.

Former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi.

Former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi.

Rajiv stopped. Kokila started reciting her poem. Dhanu (the LTTE suicide bomber) lunged forward, trying to pierce through the crowd. She was stopped in her tracks by a woman police officer, Anusuya. Rajiv noticed the dark, spectacled woman struggling to reach him and the sub­-inspector restraining her.

"Relax. Take it easy," he told Anusuya politely. Released from Anusuya's grip, Dhanu approached Rajiv, then she dropped the garland, and knelt as if to pick it up or touch his feet. Haribabu (the photographer commissioned by the LTTE to record the killing) lifted his camera to shoot his 10th photo. As he pressed the button of his camera, Dhanu activated her belt bomb.

The explosion was deafening. Dhanu was blown away. Rajiv's upper-torso was virtually wiped out, only the back of his skull remained. His body could be recognised only through his white sports shoes. It was only after about half an hour that Rajiv's body, or whatever was left of it, could be put on a stretcher and carted to hospital.

It took the hospital staff more than eight hours to sew the body before Sonia Gandhi and Priyanka arrived by a special Indian Air Force plane around 09.00 hours the next day.

All hell broke loose after the blast. People ran helter-skelter. A rumour that there would be more blasts spread like jungle fire. Within minutes, the ground was empty. Even the policemen fled. Only the IG, Raghavan, and a few policemen hung (around).

Sivarasan (LTTE's man overseeing the assassination) ran to the Indira Gandhi statue. He had directed every member of the assassination squad to reach the spot immediately after the explosion. Subha and Nalini were already waiting there. Sivarasan told them not to wait for Haribabu as he too had died.

The conspirators had not brought any vehicle as it could have been identified and their escape noted. They walked briskly towards the highway. Sivarasan was feeling thirsty. They stopped near a cluster of houses. An old woman was standing in front of her house, trying to figure out the cause of the explosion.

On Sivarasan's instructions, Nalini asked for water. After quenching his thirst, Sivarasan told the old woman Rajiv Gandhi had died in a blast.

As they neared the highway, they spotted an auto rickshaw. The driver was waiting for a group of Congress workers he had brought. Sivarasan told him there was no point waiting for anybody as a bomb had exploded and many people, including Rajiv Gandhi, had been killed. The driver, convinced by Sivarasan's argument and a promise of Rs 75, agreed to ferry them, but only up to Poonamallee where the municipal limits of his permit ended. It suited the squad fine.

The drive from Sriperumbudur to Poonamallee threw up one more mystery which remains unsolved till date. Worse, the mystery element was not even investigated.

A young man had also got into the auto. He had sat with the driver and did not talk to anyone. In fact, nobody talked to anybody, the auto driver recalled when questioned by the SIT.

The unidentified man got off about 2 km short of Poonamallee, and without a word or looking back, just disappeared into the darkness. Did he pay? The driver gave an emphatic 'no'. "I thought that he was with them," the driver said referring to Sivarasan, Nalini and Subha.

Who was this mysterious man?

Kumudavalli said she saw a young bearded man, in shirt and a pair of trousers, hanging around Sivarasan and Dhanu, talking to both of them.

Was he Sivarasan's accomplice or his boss? Most likely, this unidentified man was his assistant. Kumudavalli did not recall seeing the man giving any orders to Sivarasan.

No search party was sent to inquire about the man who got off near Poonamallee. There is no mention about him in any charge-sheet. No attempt was made to get more details of his description. No computer sketch of his was prepared. Obviously, in the absence of answers to these questions, investigators do not even know whether he is alive or dead. And yet, he could have been the key spoke in the conspiracy wheel.

On the way to Poonamallee, Sivarasan kept tearing off the pages of the notebook that he carried to pose as a reporter. Perhaps he had jotted down something. Or perhaps, he did not want even a blank notebook to fall into the hands of the police. Balls of torn pages rolled into nowhere on the wind-swept road. Nothing was left of it by the time the auto reached Poonamallee.

This was only the first leg of the journey from Sriperumbudur to Madras after the assassination. The second and third legs were rather uneventful. Sivarasan had to wake up an auto rickshaw driver in Poonamallee. He was hired only up to Mount Road, where Sivarasan took a third auto rickshaw to Kondagayayur.

Sivarasan had seen police strength swelling every minute with more and more police vehicles seen after every kilometre. Some people had started stoning vehicles also.

It was 01.30 hours when they reached Madras.

Nalini was too scared to stay alone in her room. When the auto rickshaw stopped, she did not get off saying she wanted to be with them. Sivarasan did not argue further and beckoned the driver to drive on. This was the only conversation among the hit squad members that the auto rickshaw driver recalled when interrogated by the SIT.

Sivarasan started looking for someone the moment he entered the house. He flew into a rage when he saw Santhan. Santhan was snoring away on the terrace.

The One-eyed Jack (Sivarasan) was not the type to fall apart at the drop of a hat. He performed yoga religiously every morning for half an hour. Besides keeping his body chiseled and fit like a fiddle, the yogic exercises also ensured he kept his cool under all circumstances.

It was incredible for the chief of the assassination squad to believe any member of his team could be sleeping on the night of the Tigers.

Sivarasan tried to wake up Santhan. First, he called him by name, then he shook him. When all this failed he kicked him. Santhan got up with a start.

Sivarasan told Santhan if he ever got caught it would be while he was sleeping.

Subha (the back-up assassin to Dhanu) had shut herself in a room as soon as she reached Jaykumar's house after the kill.

The Black Tigress was upset over Dhanu's death. She had controlled her tears throughout the journey from Sriperumbudur to Madras but now she confined herself in the room for two days. Her behaviour was very human, quite unlike her Black Tigress training which makes delicate girls into walking scorpions.

On May 24 night Sivarasan sent a coded message to Pottu Amman (the LTTE intelligence chief), saying: "Subha not eating. Crying all the time. Difficult for us to control her."

Pottu Amman replied that all possible attempts be made to console Subha and added that her name would be written in letters of gold in the history of "Tamil Eelam".

As everybody, including the hit squad members, fled after the blast, nobody noticed Haribabu's camera. It lay on the photographer chest for quite some before a Tamil Nadu Police officer, Raghavan, chanced upon it.

Raghavan immediately opened the camera, took out the reel and handed it over to a policeman to get it developed without any delay. A local photographer was woken up, but he did not have the facility to develop a coloured film. The policeman had to go to Madras to get the reel developed, but after the blast even the police vehicles had disappeared. Left with nothing, he hitch-hiked his way to Madras to get the reel developed.

At least one more murder would have been committed had Sivarasan known that Haribabu had left behind damning evidence and that a policeman without protection was heading in the same direction as him with it.

Haribabu's photos exposed the LTTE on May 24 when Dhanu's photograph was published by The Hindu. The next day, other newspapers published another photograph, showing Dhanu holding a garland. By now, Dhanu was the suspected suicide bomber.

The heat turned on Sivarasan and his killer squad after the One-eyed Jack was identified as the main suspect. Then began India's most dramatic manhunt.

IB's chief of operations in Madras had a sleepless night on May 21. By the next day, Vatsan and his men had received information which was to prove crucial. The Haribabu-Muthuraja-Bhagyanathan nexus had come to light. The IB had begun making discreet inquiries about Bhagyanathan, though at that time it was not known that his sister, Nalini, was a more important conspirator. Vatsan, in his early fifties made the most out of about hundred personnel under his command. Vatsan was also instrumental in steering the investigators to the right direction. "Look for the one­-eyed man, Raghuvaran," was the crisp message he passed on to the investigators.

CBI chief Vijay Karan and other investigators flew to Colombo on May 23. By that time, Vatsan and his men had collected more information about One-eyed Jack. He maintained this man could even have been involved in the Padmanabha assassination barely a year ago. Vijay Karan and company were also told by Sri Lankan officials that they would do their best if they looked for Raghuvaran whose movements in the past five or six months had been suspicious.

A Special Investigation Team, the SIT, headed by DR Karthikeyan, was formed. Karthikeyan's appointment was viewed with surprise in security and media circles. Chasing murderers through magnifying glasses was not exactly his forte.

A SIT team flew to Madras from Delhi hours after the assassination. It included Vijay Karan, additional director SK Datta, DIG Amod Kanth, SP Amit Varma, DSP M Narayana (all from the CBI), eminent explosives expert Major Sabbharwal from the NSG and three of his colleagues, computer expert D Ram from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and two more of his colleagues, and the IB's Ajit Doval (joint director, Operations), ESL Narasimhan, joint director (SA), and Colonel Sundaram.

The diminutive, dark-complexioned Doval is known for dare­devil operations and brilliant methods for collecting intelligence. Col Sundaram is a walking encyclopaedia on explosives and ammunitions. Narasimhan is an expert on the LTTE and knows the terrorist outfit like the back of his palm.

RAW chief GS Bajpai and his IB counterpart MK Narayanan also arrived in Madras. Their efforts were supplemented by invaluable local inputs from AX Alexander (RAW), Vatsan (IB), S Ramani from the CBI, who later briefly became security advisor-cum-investigator to the Jain Commission of Inquiry, and IG RK Raghavan, DIG Perumal Swami, SP D Manoharan (all of the Tamil Nadu police). M Raghottaman, a DSP of CBI, Madras,worked as SIT's chief investigating officer. CBI's legal wing officer Jacob Daniel was made available to the SIT full time for his advice on tricky situations.

Initially, about 30 investigators worked on the SIT round the clock. Besides, a host of finger-print, forensic, ballistic and computer experts were roped in. A number of commandos were attached to the SIT and put under the command of a highly­ motivated officer, Captain Ravi. Several squads of sniffer dogs and a helicopter were kept at the SIT's disposal. As the case became curiouser and curiouser, the SIT's strength rose steadily, peaking at over a hundred.

The SIT was equipped well to crack open a blind assassination. But initially, top investigative brains of the country did not even know for hours together whether it was a bomb or a landmine that killed Rajiv.

The writer is a Firstpost columnist who tweets @Kishkindha and can be reached at bhootnath004@yahoo.com


Maha cabinet gives green signal to Rs 100-cr Shivaji statue

Mumbai: The Maharashtra cabinet today approved a proposal to allocate Rs 100 crore for installation of a statue of warrior king Shivaji in the Arabian sea off the Mumbai coast.

According to Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan, it will be the tallest statue (in the world). However, he refused to specify how high it would be.

Prithviraj Chavan. AFP image

Prithviraj Chavan. AFP image

"International bids have been invited. Concept plan has been readied. We have asked the Ministry of Environment and Forest to give exemption as the site comes under CRZ-4 category (where no construction can take place)," he said. Chavan said the site, where the statue would come up, is a 16-hectare bedrock in the sea. Even during high tide, the rock stands 3 to 4 meters above sea-level.

"The site is 1.2 km from Raj Bhawan, 3.6 km from Girgaum and 2.6 km from Nariman Point," the CM added. In June last year, the Centre had approved in-principle the politically sensitive project as a special case.

Reportedly, the statue of the warrior king facing the Marine Drive in South Mumbai, will be taller than the proposed
Sardar Vallabhai Patel statue (182 metres) in Gujarat.

PTI


Lokpal: BJP takes jurist appointment row to the President

New Delhi: Upping the ante, BJP today took the controversy over appointment of a jurist to Lokpal selection panel to the President's doorstep, seeking his support for its demand for a consensus on the issue after differences emerged over the name of the Supreme Court lawyer.

Opposing government's nominee P P Rao for appointment on the panel, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj met Mukherjee and lodged her protest at the manner in which the government pushed for his nomination and sought the President's intervention.

Pranab Mukherjee. PTI

Pranab Mukherjee. PTI

Swaraj, who is a member of the Lokpal Selection Committee, feels that Rao is a "Congress loyalist" and should not be in the panel to ensure its neutrality.

At the official party briefing, BJP's deputy leader in Rajya Sabha Ravishankar Prasad blamed the Prime Minister for the row and accused him of having "failed" in his duty on the Lokpal appointment issue as it went against the spirit of Parliamentary approval.

"Dr Manmohan Singh by insisting upon this one particular name and forcing its approval is seeking to negate the entire spirit of Select Committee recommendations and Parliamentary approval.

"The first and foremost blame lies with the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister as Prime Minister and leader of a team in the collegium must make an effort to bring about a consensus. He failed in the case of CVC. I am sorry to say he has failed all the more in the case of a Lokpal," Prasad said.

The BJP leader also sought to question the Prime Minister on why he was insisting on one name and why he was not in favour of bringing about a consensus to have an eminent jurist as part of the Selection Committee for the ombudsman appointment.

PTI


Why Modi failed to speak to Mamata’s maa, maati, manush

Perhaps Narendra Modi finally tired of Mamata Banerjee's public snubs, because he tore into her government in West Bengal with an enthusiasm West Bengal's BJP cadre has not seen before.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

For a state that sent just one member to the Lok Sabha in 2009 (Jaswant Singh), Modi took a rather bold step in mocking Mamata. The state's 42 LS seats could be a critical gap for Modi's Mission 272.

"Give me all your seats," he told the gathered crowd, "and we will have a contest to see whether a BJP-led Central government does more for West Bengal or the state government."

The BJP is also completely absent in the state's Legislative Assembly. The 294-member Assembly is now dominated by the Trinamool Congress. In 2006, they contested 26 seats of these 294 and won none. In 2011, they contested all 294 seats. And again returned a zero-win result. In effect, the BJP is nearly non-existent in the West Bengal polity.

Given that Modi's Prime Ministerial dreams hinge on some extent on his performance in states where the BJP has no presence, the Gujarat CM may have been better advised had he remain patient. An opinion poll conducted by CSDS for the Lokniti-IBN poll tracker suggested that even compared to last year, a greater percentage of people approve of the present Trinamool Congress government in West Bengal.

Thirty nine percent of the respondents said that they prefer the current TMC government, as opposed to 30 percent who said that the Left government was better. And, of the people giving a thumbs up to the Mamata Banerjee government, 54 percent are Muslims. In fact, Muslim support for the TMC seems to have gone up in the recent past sharply -- just 39 percent of respondents who preferred the TMC government in 2013 were Muslims. That statistic is reason enough to suggest that wooing Mamata will be crucial for any party hoping to grab a sizeable number of Lok Sabha seats from West Bengal.

Doubtless, the BJP's popularity is on a slow rise, thanks mostly to apparent faith in Modi being the best man for the country's top job. The poll showed BJP's estimated vote share up to 14 percent now from 12 percent last year.

But the Trinamool Congress still has nearly triple the vote share, at 33 percent. There is a rider to that -- eighteen percent of the respondents believed that Narendra Modi was a better Prime Ministerial candidate than Mamata, who got eleven percent votes.  (Read more here)

Given that Mamata Banerjee has been a part of the NDA in the past and switching national allies has not really affected her political prospects at home before now, one would have expected her to join hands with BJP without batting an eyelid. She has to swallow quite a bit of her pride to go back to the Congress and the BJP could have been a great choice, but there is just one thing holding her back - and that is Modi and his reputation for being Muslim unfriendly to put it lightly.

Banerjee has always played to the galleries when it came to the Muslim vote bank and Modi is a risk she is probably not ready for. She has made sure Taslima Nasreen doesn't come back to Kolkata, she has given various sops to maulvis despite criticism and she has even not spoken up when Muslim fundamentalist organisations tried to disrupt a book launch which they alleged was anti-Muslim.

He suggested - and Mamata Banerjee will absolutely not be delighted to hear this -  that Muslims have been deliberately left out of the development drive in Bengal. Banerjee has probably taken all appeasing measures possible, including proposing reservations for jobs for Muslims, after she came to power in Bengal.

"We have a Haj quota of 3,800 and we get 37,000 applications. Bengal has a Haj quota of 12,000 and a bigger Muslim population than Gujarat, yet they get just 11,600 Haj applications. This shows that Muslims don't have enough money to travel to Haj. This also shows that they have not been included in the development race in the state."

Also, while Mamata has not vocally backed the idea of the Third Front, she has suggested forming a federal front - something Modi dismissed as a 'third rate' solution for the country's problems in his Kolkata rally. Again, Mamata might not indulge in the luxury of reading between the lines and categorising it as an attack on Mulayam Singh Yadav. She is most likely to take this as an attack on her politics and jeopardise BJP's chances of forming an alliance with TMC.

Then again, in his somewhat confused stance on the Trinamool Congress - where he at once derided the condition of the state and at the same time chose to not haul up Mamata vocally for her performance as CM - Modi then tried playing on Bengali pride so to say. Some one must have briefed him about Bengal's deep devotion to Sourav Ganguly and the state's cricket fans' grudge against national cricket bodies and stars like Sachin Tendulkar and Mahendra Singh Dhoni for the treatment meted out to their favourite cricketer.

Assuming that Bengal's voters possibly suffer from a persecution complex epidemic, Modi sought to comment on what is easily Congress' internal politics.  He first said, "You have placed Mamata ji in power for the state, you can put me at the Centre and there is Pranab da at the top anyway."

He then went on to remind his audience how Pranab Mukherjee was given a short shrift by Congress in the past and instead of choosing him as the PM candidate after Indira Gandhi was killed, Rajiv Gandhi was made the Prime Minister. "Again in 2004, Sonia Gandhi chose Manmohan Singh as the PM candidate and not Pranab Mukherjee," he said, his voice deep with remorse for Pranab Mukherjee's aborted political ambitions.

It's another thing that Bengal's Sourav Ganguly complex probably extends to its biryani, sweets and its literature - not so much its politicians.

Finally, Modi refused to touch any topic that is typical to Bengal or has had a bearing on the state's politics. From the contentious issue of land acquisition which had put CPI(M) in a spot to Mamata's stir against UPA's price hike - Modi scrupulously steered clear of topics that Bengal obsesses about. He did touch upon the state of industry - he said that industry is on a back foot -  but he neither mentioned what could be a possible remedy for it, nor did he enumerate the reasons why he thought Bengal's industry suffers. Possibly because, the current Bengal government's pro-farmer stance, which cost it the Tata Nano project, is something Modi is not ready to address yet.

Modi mentioned that agriculture is suffering in Bengal, though there are rivers abound in the state - one will remember he said exactly that in Bundelkhand, UP and a few other places too. Mamata rode to power from the great wave of support from rural Bengal - a part of Bengal which thrives on agriculture and saw Mamata'a anti-Tata move as one that is pro-agriculture. The same project which then found pride of place in Sanand, Gujarat. Did Modi effectively communicate with those voters who bear the largest chunk of Bengal's vote? No, he didn't.

He pointed out that while Bengal was the leader in the IT revolution that India saw, most other states left it behind within a short period of time. Apart from what is common knowledge, did he explain what ails the services industry in Bengal or what could possibly be a solution to its tribulations? No, he didn't.

He talked about electricity problems in Kolkata, which is fairly well-placed in terms of power supply. He spoke about unemployment, which as as much an problem of any other Indian state, as it is Bengal's. He neither spoke about the several hundreds of acres of land, which now lie in the Tata Motors' deserted plant and remains undeveloped and also out of reach of the farmers who owned them. Nor did he speak about the Maoist problems the state faced or the Gorkhaland stir that Mamata Banerjee very recently managed to stifle.

"Give me the responsibility of Bengal at the Centre," he exhorted. Did he give another reason, except for the Congress' failure, why? No.

Nostalgia and Tagore, a nice speech make. Only, it doesn't earn anyone votes.


Criminal complaint against Kejriwal to be heard February 7

New Delhi:  A court here will Feb 7 hear a criminal complaint against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for allegedly giving "misleading information" in his affidavit filed prior to the assembly elections.

Metropolitan Magistrate Swati Katiyar, while posting the matter for Friday, said Wednesday that she would first go through the complaint and then only proceed further in the matter.

Arvind Kejriwal. Firstpost image

Arvind Kejriwal. Firstpost image

"Let me go through the file and let me see the provision ... you come on Feb 7," the judge said.

The petition was filed by non-governmental organisation (NGO) Maulik Bharat Trust, through its office-bearers, alleging "wilful concealment and suppression of correct address and value of the aforesaid property amounts to commission of a criminal offence under section 125A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951".

Earlier, the NGO had approached the Delhi High Court with a plea seeking quashing of nomination papers of Kejriwal on the ground of "illegalities" in his affidavit filed before the poll panel.

The high court had refused to entertain the plea and directed the petitioners to approach a magisterial court for the remedy.


Ramdev attacks Congress, backs Modi for PM

Mumbai: Yoga guru Ramdev today attacked Congress while backing BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi for the top post.

"My family used to vote for Congress. My grandfather used to vote for Congress. However, later he became blind. I told him that if you want to save yourself, stop voting for them," Ramdev said while addressing a press conference in Mumbai.

Ramdev. PTI

Ramdev. PTI

"Unfortunately, some (political) sins were committed by our ancestors. They affected the entire country. It should not happen again," he said.

Ramdev said he met Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray and discussed defeating Congress.

Their aim, he said, was to get a stable and strong government at the Centre to root out corruption and bring back the black money stashed abroad.

Ramdev also took a dig at the Gujarat government on its poverty index figures.

"Be it any party, whoever is doing this (playing with figures), we oppose it. And we want that... poverty should be eradicated. Price rise and unemployment should be ended," he said.

PTI


Modi picks on Mamata in Kolkata; will NDA suffer?

4.30 pm: Modi targets Mamata's loyal vote bank - Muslims

Given that Mamata Banerjee has been a part of the NDA in the past and switching national allies has not really affected her political prospects at home before now, one would have expected her to join hands with BJP without batting an eyelid. She has to swallow quite a bit of her pride to go back to the Congress and the BJP could have been a great choice, but there is just one thing holding her back - and that is Modi and his reputation for being Muslim unfriendly to put it lightly.

Given that Mamata Banerjee has always played to the galleries when it came to the Muslim vote bank, Modi is a risk she is probably not ready for. She has made sure Taslima Nasreen doesn't come back to Kolkata, she has given various sops to maulvis despite criticism and she has even not spoken up when Muslim fundamentalist organisations tried to disrupt a book launch which they alleged was anti-Muslim.

He suggested - and Mamata Banerjee will absolutely not be delighted to hear this -  that Muslims have been deliberately left out of the development drive in Bengal. Banerjee has probably taken all appeasing measures possible, including proposing reservations for jobs for Muslims, after she came to power in Bengal.

"We have a Haj quota of 3,800 and we get 37,000 applications. Bengal has a Haj quota of 12,000 and a bigger Muslim population than Gujarat, yet they get just 11,600 Haj applications. This shows that Muslims don't have enough money to travel to Haj. This also shows that they have not been included in the development race in the state."

Also, while Mamata has not vocally backed the idea of the Third Front, she has suggested forming a federal front - something Modi dismissed as a 'third rate' solution for the country's problems in his Kolkata rally. Again, Mamata might not indulge in the luxury of reading between the lines and categorising it as an attack on Mulayam Singh Yadav. She is most likely to take this as an attack on her politics and jeopardise BJP's chances of forming an alliance with TMC.

4.15 pm: Bengal's best friend Modi?

Continuing in his somewhat confused stance on the Trinamool Congress - where he at once derided the condition of the state and at the same time chose to not haul up Mamata vocally for her performance as CM - Modi then tried playing on Bengali pride so to say. Some one must have briefed him about Bengal's deep devotion to Sourav Ganguly and the state's cricket fans' grudge against national cricket bodies and stars like Sachin Tendulkar and Mahendra Singh Dhoni for the treatment meted out to their favourite cricketer.

Assuming that Bengal's voters possibly suffer from a persecution complex epidemic, Modi sought to comment on what is easily Congress' internal politics.  He first said, "You have placed Mamata ji in power for the state, you can put me at the Centre and there is Pranab da at the top anyway."

He then went on to remind his audience how Pranab Mukherjee was given a short shrift by Congress in the past and instead of choosing him as the PM candidate after Indira Gandhi was killed, Rajiv Gandhi was made the Prime Minister. "Again in 2004, Sonia Gandhi chose Manmohan Singh as the PM candidate and not Pranab Mukherjee," he said, his voice deep with remorse for Pranab Mukherjee's aborted political ambitions.

It's another thing that Bengal's Sourav Ganguly complex probably extends to its biryani, sweets and its literature - not so much its politicians.

3.54: Modi takes on Mamata's 'maa maati maanush'

Not only did Modi snatch Mamata Banerjee's favourite catchline, "Chitto Jetha Bhoy Shunno", he also took on her party's slogan - 'Maa, Maati, Manush' and pointed out that women were not exactly leading rosy lives in the land where they are associated with the mother (maa). "In the land where women are given the highest respect girl children can't go to school because there are no toilets in government schools," he said.

3.40 pm: Modi takes on both Mamata and the CPM

Modi slammed the CPM government and the Mamata Banerjee government together, though he went a little soft on the latter. "I congratulate you for having overthrown a regime that sucked the blood out of Bengal, that destroyed its 'sonar Bangla' reputation," he said.

He then spoke about 'poriborton'. "You called for poriborton (change). Have you seen poriborton around you? Can you see the change, do you feel the change?" he asked, taking an indirect dig at the Mamata Banerjee government.

Blowing alternatively hot and cold on the Mamata Banerjee government, Modi chose to dismiss the TMC government instead of attacking it, like he does in states with opponent parties in power. Clearly, Trinamool Congress, with its 19 seats in Lok Sabha is not someone Modi can afford to rub the wrong way, as of yet.

Given that the pro-BJP wave in Bengal is a myth that only the party wants to believe in, Modi ticked off the TMC government ever-s0-gently and went all guns blazing and Bengal's current favourite dartboard, the CPM.

He said, "You have already given Mamata Banerjee the responsibility to bring about change in Bengal. I suggest, you give me the responsibility to bring about change in the country. West Bengal government alone cannot change the state's fortunes. You need a government at the Centre to back the state government," said Modi.

However, he didn't let off Mamata all too easily. He reiterated the fact that industry is on a back foot, like is education and employment. "Why is the state which has rivers and such a great climate, lagging behind in agriculture?  Why is their no electricity? If Gujarat can get electricity, even Bengal can? Ask for your rights," he asked the audience.

"Give me all the Lok Sabha seats," he said. "For the sake of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, if nothing else," appealed the Gujarat CM, hardly realising that Shyama Prasad Mukherjee's legacy is one that is lost on the audience he is speaking to at the moment.

3.21 pm: Modi greets Bengal in broken Bengali

The way to a Bengali's heart is partly through the stomach, yes, but also through a few words spoken in Bengali when it is least expected. Narendra Modi got the feeling perfectly right as he began his address with a few lines in Bengali. Reading out from a paper, Modi greeted Bengal and said that the land is known for its 'roshogollo' (not roshogolla), sondesh, dhaak and Durga Puja. "The country knows Bengal for its intelligence and sweet nature," he said.

He then resorted to drawing parallels between Gujarat and Bengal - and no he didn't speak about the mutual predilection for sugar. In fact, he turned to one name, which is a sure shot crowd puller in Bengal - Rabindranath Tagore. "Guruji's brother spent a long time in Bengal and helped in the development of Ahmedabad," he said, though he didn't name the said brother.

He also added that Subhas Chandra Bose's brother's family lives in Gujarat and has had a huge role to play in the progress of Gujarat.

2.00 pm: Modi to address rally in Kolkata

After two massive rallies in the Hindi heartland of Uttar Pradesh, BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi is set to address a rally in Kolkata his first ever rally in the eastern state.

The BJP, a minor party in West Bengal, is expecting at least 5 lakh people at the Brigade Parade ground venue, to outdo Chief Minister and TMC Chief Mamata Banerjee's rally held last week.

BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. AFP

BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. AFP

"We don't want dynastic rule, nor do we want a government of rioters at the Centre. We want a people's government," Banerjee had said at her rally on 30 January, further saying that the TMC would go it alone in the 2014 polls.

Besides attacking the Gandhis, Modi's speech will be closely watched for his remarks on Mamata Banerjee. In Uttar Pradesh, Modi had said, "Mamata fights for Bengal; what do (UP leaders) Akhilesh, Mayawati do for you?"

Modi is also likely to raise the issue of declassification of secret files on Netaji Subash Chandra Bose's death.

On Tuesday, BJP had criticised the state government for alleged non-cooperation with Gujarat security officials. The Army denied the BJP permission to land Modi's helicopter at the Race Course ground in the city, which the BJP alleged was a "conspiracy" by the Centre.

West Bengal BJP President Rahul Sinha said that it had been planned to bring the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate by helicopter from the NSC Bose International Airport to avoid traffic snarls.

"But permission was denied at the last moment. It is a conspiracy by the UPA government," he alleged.


India getting terrorism info from various countries: Farooq

Jammu: Union Minister Farooq Abdullah today said India is getting information on terrorism from various countries, particularly America, which would help to fight the menace.

"Much of the information, we are getting from other countries. We are getting information about terrorists from America," he told reporters at Jammu university here.

Farooq Abdullah. AFP image

Farooq Abdullah. AFP image

The former Chief Minister said there is sharing of information among countries and terrorism has become such a common cause that nations are fighting it together.

On reports about the British role in assisting India in Operation Blue Star, he said, "It is a good thing to open the documents. Foreign Secretary (William Hague) has already said that they were party to 1984." The Minister was responding to a question about reopening documents relating to Operation Blue Star to flush out militants from the Golden Temple in 1984.

Foreign Secretary William Hague has said Britain's role in assisting India in mounting Operation Blue Star was "limited" and "purely advisory" and the UK had played no role in the actual operation that took place at the Golden Temple in Amritsar.

PTI


Dwivedi’s suggestion on ending caste based quote causes uproar in Parl

New Delhi: Congress leader Janardan Dwivedi's suggestion on ending caste-based reservation and go for quota on economic criteria created an uproar in Parliament today with the government clarifying that it was not considering any such proposal.

"Government is not considering any proposal to provide reservation based on economic criteria. The reservation as it stands today will continue as per constitutional provision," Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Shukla said in the Rajya Sabha.

Representational image. AFP

Representational image. AFP

If an office bearer has made any such statement, it is his personal view, Shukla said after the issue created trouble in the House with SP and BSP members stormed the Well protesting against the statement of Dwivedi, Congress General Secretary.

BSP members shouted slogans "anti-poor government, down down" in the Well. Members of JD(U) were on their feet on the issue.

When protesting members sought reply from the government, Shukla informed the House that Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment Mallikarjun Kharge would be apprised of the matter to make a statement on the issue later.

SP leader Ram Gopal Yadav said the Centre had taken into account the demands of his party as well as the state governments with regard to bringing 17 castes that are OBCs under scheduled caste (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) category.

KC Tyagi (JD-U) observed that "Congress party is doing away with the reservation system. There is conspiracy."

He sought continuation of the existing reservation system without any change.

Dwivedi, who is a member of the Upper House, was present when Shukla made the clarification.

The issue also was raised in the Lok Sabha with BSP members storming the Well but what they were saying was not heard in the din over the issue of Telangana.

PTI


Live: Modi picks on Mamata in Kolkata; will NDA suffer?

4.30 pm: Modi targets Mamata's loyal vote bank - Muslims

Given that Mamata Banerjee has been a part of the NDA in the past and switching national allies has not really affected her political prospects at home before now, one would have expected her to join hands with BJP without batting an eyelid. She has to swallow quite a bit of her pride to go back to the Congress and the BJP could have been a great choice, but there is just one thing holding her back - and that is Modi and his reputation for being Muslim unfriendly to put it lightly.

Given that Mamata Banerjee has always played to the galleries when it came to the Muslim vote bank, Modi is a risk she is probably not ready for. She has made sure Taslima Nasreen doesn't come back to Kolkata, she has given various sops to maulvis despite criticism and she has even not spoken up when Muslim fundamentalist organisations tried to disrupt a book launch which they alleged was anti-Muslim.

He suggested - and Mamata Banerjee will absolutely not be delighted to hear this -  that Muslims have been deliberately left out of the development drive in Bengal. Banerjee has probably taken all appeasing measures possible, including proposing reservations for jobs for Muslims, after she came to power in Bengal.

"We have a Haj quota of 3,800 and we get 37,000 applications. Bengal has a Haj quota of 12,000 and a bigger Muslim population than Gujarat, yet they get just 11,600 Haj applications. This shows that Muslims don't have enough money to travel to Haj. This also shows that they have not been included in the development race in the state."

Also, while Mamata has not vocally backed the idea of the Third Front, she has suggested forming a federal front - something Modi dismissed as a 'third rate' solution for the country's problems in his Kolkata rally. Again, Mamata might not indulge in the luxury of reading between the lines and categorising it as an attack on Mulayam Singh Yadav. She is most likely to take this as an attack on her politics and jeopardise BJP's chances of forming an alliance with TMC.

4.15 pm: Bengal's best friend Modi?

Continuing in his somewhat confused stance on the Trinamool Congress - where he at once derided the condition of the state and at the same time chose to not haul up Mamata vocally for her performance as CM - Modi then tried playing on Bengali pride so to say. Some one must have briefed him about Bengal's deep devotion to Sourav Ganguly and the state's cricket fans' grudge against national cricket bodies and stars like Sachin Tendulkar and Mahendra Singh Dhoni for the treatment meted out to their favourite cricketer.

Assuming that Bengal's voters possibly suffer from a persecution complex epidemic, Modi sought to comment on what is easily Congress' internal politics.  He first said, "You have placed Mamata ji in power for the state, you can put me at the Centre and there is Pranab da at the top anyway."

He then went on to remind his audience how Pranab Mukherjee was given a short shrift by Congress in the past and instead of choosing him as the PM candidate after Indira Gandhi was killed, Rajiv Gandhi was made the Prime Minister. "Again in 2004, Sonia Gandhi chose Manmohan Singh as the PM candidate and not Pranab Mukherjee," he said, his voice deep with remorse for Pranab Mukherjee's aborted political ambitions.

It's another thing that Bengal's Sourav Ganguly complex probably extends to its biryani, sweets and its literature - not so much its politicians.

3.54: Modi takes on Mamata's 'maa maati maanush'

Not only did Modi snatch Mamata Banerjee's favourite catchline, "Chitto Jetha Bhoy Shunno", he also took on her party's slogan - 'Maa, Maati, Manush' and pointed out that women were not exactly leading rosy lives in the land where they are associated with the mother (maa). "In the land where women are given the highest respect girl children can't go to school because there are no toilets in government schools," he said.

3.40 pm: Modi takes on both Mamata and the CPM

Modi slammed the CPM government and the Mamata Banerjee government together, though he went a little soft on the latter. "I congratulate you for having overthrown a regime that sucked the blood out of Bengal, that destroyed its 'sonar Bangla' reputation," he said.

He then spoke about 'poriborton'. "You called for poriborton (change). Have you seen poriborton around you? Can you see the change, do you feel the change?" he asked, taking an indirect dig at the Mamata Banerjee government.

Blowing alternatively hot and cold on the Mamata Banerjee government, Modi chose to dismiss the TMC government instead of attacking it, like he does in states with opponent parties in power. Clearly, Trinamool Congress, with its 19 seats in Lok Sabha is not someone Modi can afford to rub the wrong way, as of yet.

Given that the pro-BJP wave in Bengal is a myth that only the party wants to believe in, Modi ticked off the TMC government ever-s0-gently and went all guns blazing and Bengal's current favourite dartboard, the CPM.

He said, "You have already given Mamata Banerjee the responsibility to bring about change in Bengal. I suggest, you give me the responsibility to bring about change in the country. West Bengal government alone cannot change the state's fortunes. You need a government at the Centre to back the state government," said Modi.

However, he didn't let off Mamata all too easily. He reiterated the fact that industry is on a back foot, like is education and employment. "Why is the state which has rivers and such a great climate, lagging behind in agriculture?  Why is their no electricity? If Gujarat can get electricity, even Bengal can? Ask for your rights," he asked the audience.

"Give me all the Lok Sabha seats," he said. "For the sake of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, if nothing else," appealed the Gujarat CM, hardly realising that Shyama Prasad Mukherjee's legacy is one that is lost on the audience he is speaking to at the moment.

3.21 pm: Modi greets Bengal in broken Bengali

The way to a Bengali's heart is partly through the stomach, yes, but also through a few words spoken in Bengali when it is least expected. Narendra Modi got the feeling perfectly right as he began his address with a few lines in Bengali. Reading out from a paper, Modi greeted Bengal and said that the land is known for its 'roshogollo' (not roshogolla), sondesh, dhaak and Durga Puja. "The country knows Bengal for its intelligence and sweet nature," he said.

He then resorted to drawing parallels between Gujarat and Bengal - and no he didn't speak about the mutual predilection for sugar. In fact, he turned to one name, which is a sure shot crowd puller in Bengal - Rabindranath Tagore. "Guruji's brother spent a long time in Bengal and helped in the development of Ahmedabad," he said, though he didn't name the said brother.

He also added that Subhas Chandra Bose's brother's family lives in Gujarat and has had a huge role to play in the progress of Gujarat.

2.00 pm: Modi to address rally in Kolkata

After two massive rallies in the Hindi heartland of Uttar Pradesh, BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi is set to address a rally in Kolkata his first ever rally in the eastern state.

The BJP, a minor party in West Bengal, is expecting at least 5 lakh people at the Brigade Parade ground venue, to outdo Chief Minister and TMC Chief Mamata Banerjee's rally held last week.

BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. AFP

BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. AFP

"We don't want dynastic rule, nor do we want a government of rioters at the Centre. We want a people's government," Banerjee had said at her rally on 30 January, further saying that the TMC would go it alone in the 2014 polls.

Besides attacking the Gandhis, Modi's speech will be closely watched for his remarks on Mamata Banerjee. In Uttar Pradesh, Modi had said, "Mamata fights for Bengal; what do (UP leaders) Akhilesh, Mayawati do for you?"

Modi is also likely to raise the issue of declassification of secret files on Netaji Subash Chandra Bose's death.

On Tuesday, BJP had criticised the state government for alleged non-cooperation with Gujarat security officials. The Army denied the BJP permission to land Modi's helicopter at the Race Course ground in the city, which the BJP alleged was a "conspiracy" by the Centre.

West Bengal BJP President Rahul Sinha said that it had been planned to bring the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate by helicopter from the NSC Bose International Airport to avoid traffic snarls.

"But permission was denied at the last moment. It is a conspiracy by the UPA government," he alleged.


Why Modi’s move to mock Mamata may backfire for the BJP

Perhaps Narendra Modi finally tired of Mamata Banerjee's public snubs, because he tore into her government in West Bengal with an enthusiasm West Bengal's BJP cadre has not seen before.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

Narendra Modi. Reuters.

For a state that sent just one member to the Lok Sabha in 2009 (Jaswant Singh), Modi took a rather bold step in mocking Mamata. The state's 42 LS seats could be a critical gap for Modi's Mission 272.

"Give me all your seats," he told the gathered crowd, "and we will have a contest to see whether a BJP-led Central government does more for West Bengal or the state government."

The BJP is also completely absent in the state's Legislative Assembly. The 294-member Assembly is now dominated by the Trinamool Congress. In 2006, they contested 26 seats of these 294 and won none. In 2011, they contested all 294 seats. And again returned a zero-win result. In effect, the BJP is nearly non-existent in the West Bengal polity.

Given that Modi's Prime Ministerial dreams hinge on some extent on his performance in states where the BJP has no presence, the Gujarat CM may have been better advised had he remain patient. An opinion poll conducted by CSDS for the Lokniti-IBN poll tracker suggested that even compared to last year, a greater percentage of people approve of the present Trinamool Congress government in West Bengal.

Thirty nine percent of the respondents said that they prefer the current TMC government, as opposed to 30 percent who said that the Left government was better. And, of the people giving a thumbs up to the Mamata Banerjee government, 54 percent are Muslims. In fact, Muslim support for the TMC seems to have gone up in the recent past sharply -- just 39 percent of respondents who preferred the TMC government in 2013 were Muslims. That statistic is reason enough to suggest that wooing Mamata will be crucial for any party hoping to grab a sizeable number of Lok Sabha seats from West Bengal.

Doubtless, the BJP's popularity is on a slow rise, thanks mostly to apparent faith in Modi being the best man for the country's top job. The poll showed BJP's estimated vote share up to 14 percent now from 12 percent last year.

But the Trinamool Congress still has nearly triple the vote share, at 33 percent. There is a rider to that -- eighteen percent of the respondents believed that Narendra Modi was a better Prime Ministerial candidate than Mamata, who got eleven percent votes.  (Read more here)

However, if that opinion is enough to convince them to vote for the BJP remains to be seen.