Thursday, January 16, 2014

Get act together before LS polls, become proactive: CWC tells govt

New Delhi: With Congress' debacle in four states being attributed to price rise, government today came under fire at the meeting of the extended Congress Working Committee with leaders asking it to get its act together before the Lok Sabha elections.

Government should turn proactive to roll out measures that would benefit the 'aam aadmi' like raising the limit of subsidised LPG cylinders from nine to 12 and eschew from steps like petrol price hike, the Congress leaders said.

PIB

PIB

Petroleum Minister M Veerappa Moily was 'cornered', a member said, adding that leaders insisted that the government should not delay a decision on the issue of LPG cylinders.

Kerala PCC chief Ramesh Chennithala was in the forefront of the attack. "It needs to be pondered whether we are going ahead with liberalisation that has a human face," he is learnt to have said in the meeting.

Chennithala, whose state Kerala is dominated by the Left discourse, opposed FDI in retail. AICC general secretary Madhusudan Mistri, who is close to Rahul Gandhi, also spoke on the need for policies with a pro-poor face. There was also a demand that there is a need to "revisit" the economic policies.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Finance Minister P Chidambaram, who were present, did not speak in the meeting. After the defeat in the four states, party chief Sonia Gandhi had said that price rise was one of the reasons.

A section in the Congress has been emphasising the need for rolling out more subsidies in petrol and diesel and take other populist measures to change the adverse political atmosphere ahead of the Lok Sabha polls.

PTI


Virbhadra’s son rejects BJP’s allegations against his father

New Delhi: Rubbishing BJP's charges against his father, Himachal Pradesh Youth Congress president Vikramaditya Singh today said that they would fight it "politically and legally".

"The allegations, which have been levelled against the Chief Minister, are just to hide their corruption which they have done during their tenure. We will fight both politically and legally," Singh, who is the son of Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh, said.

Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh (R). Image courtesy PIB

Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh (R). Image courtesy PIB

His remarks came as Virbhadra today filed three defamation cases against Arun Jaitley and other BJP leaders, in a Shimla court accusing them of unleashing a malicious campaign against him and his family through media to tarnish his image.

Vikramaditya Singh said the allegations against Virbhadra were nothing new.

"This is not the first time they have targeted Virbhadra Singhji. In both the cases charge sheet was filed and Virbhadra Singh was held innocent by the courts," he stated.

Jaitley had written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh alleging that Virbhadra Singh had taken bribe from a private power company and had demanded a CBI inquiry, calling it an "open and shut case of corruption", but the Chief Minister had denied the charges.

Jaitley had alleged that Singh, his family members and their company have received interest free loan from the promoter of a power company, which had transactions with the Himachal Pradesh government.

PTI


Cong avoided naming Rahul as PM candidate as he is no match for Modi: BJP

New Delhi: Taunting the Congress, BJP today said it had avoided naming Rahul Gandhi as its Prime Ministerial candidate as it was aware of an impending defeat in the Lok Sabha polls.

BJP said naming of Rahul Gandhi as the Congress' Prime Ministerial nominee would have led to comparisons with Narendra Modi against whom the Congress Vice President "stands
no chance". Party president Rajnath Singh said the Congress decision indicated that they accepted that Modi is going to be the Prime Minister.

File photo of Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi.

File photos of Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi.

Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley said the decision of the Congress demonstrated that it had recognised the reality.

"I think it is a recognition of reality since they know they are not going to form the government. Then why the need for announcing a PM candidate. I think, any party which takes a decision of this kind weighs the realities," he said.

He said Congress intent would also have been to "duck" a comparison with Modi for the country's top post.

BJP's Deputy Leader in the Rajya Sabha Ravi Shankar Prasad said the Congress knew that it would lose badly and it would not want a head of the Gandhi family to be its Prime Ministerial candidate in such a situation.

"They know that the Congress is in for a major defeat. That is why the Congress, which is definitely going to lose, did not want to make the head of the Gandhi family as its Prime Ministerial candidate," he said.

"They have not presented him as the Prime Ministerial candidate, because if they had done so there would have been comparisons, analysis vis a vis Narendra Modi and all surveys show that Rahul Gandhi stands nowhere in that. That is why they have not named him as the Prime Ministerial candidate but the campaign chief," Prasad said.

PTI


Rape tendencies start from drug, sex rackets: says Delhi CM Kejriwal

A furious Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday sought to blame the Delhi Police for the recent gangrape of a 51-year old Danish national saying the force was 'highly compromised'.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. Firstpost/Naresh Sharma

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. Firstpost/Naresh Sharma

Slammed for his silence on the case, Kejriwal at a press conference this afternoon said crimes against women in Delhi happen 'in spite of the Delhi Police', further stating that 'rape tendencies arise out of sex and drug rackets'.

"Rape tendencies start from drug and sex rackets... If people complain about crime should not the police act?" Kejriwal said, adding that "the people in Delhi will not be a mute spectator and the issue will be taken to the Delhi governor."

The press briefing was also attended by Delhi Law Minister Somnath Bharti and Women and Child Welfare Minister Rakhi Birla, who both hit out at the Delhi Police for its inaction on cases raised by them.

After reporters questioned the manner in Bharti was caught in a scuffle with the Delhi Police on Wednesday night, Kejriwal said they were right in what they were doing and the police commissioner should sack both the SHOs who were in-charge.

The Chief Minister said his government sought the immediate suspension of two SHOs and two ACPs allegedly involved.

"We demand as well as give ultimatum to Delhi Police to suspend the erring SHOs of Sagarpur and Malviya Nagar police station. Sagarpur police did not take action against the family who burnt their daughter-in-law even after Women and Child Development Minister Rakhi Birla  (registered a complaint) while Malviya Nagar police plainly refused to take action in the alleged sex and drug trafficking racket being run from Khirki village despite the Law Minister's tip-off," Kejriwal said.

He also demanded the suspension of the two ACPs who had come to the spot and allegedly did not act.

Reacting to Delhi Police's statements about ministers interfering in their work, Kejriwal said,"How can Delhi Police say that state ministers are interfering in their work? Police are just refusing to act."

"Go drown yourself.. there's a minister here doing your job at 3 am...," Bharti had told a Delhi Police official while forcing him to conduct a raid at a residence in his constituency, alleging that there was a drug and prostitution racket taking place.

The police official, however, refused to conduct any raid saying the minister had no right to tell the police how to do their job saying,"We will function according to our limits... you are trying to take revenge (against the previous minister)."

Meanwhile, Delhi Police Commissioner BS Bassi refused to comment on the issue saying he was unaware of what the Delhi CM had said and will only make a statement after he is seized of the matter.

"There are no war of words between the government and the police. The police is capable of protecting Delhi's citizens. I want to assure Delhi's citizens that we will take all action to keep them safe," he said.


Telangana debate to resume Friday, AP assembly session may be extended

Hyderabad: The debate on the draft Telangana Bill will resume in the Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Friday when the House reassembles after a week-long Sankranti festival break.

Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly. AFP

Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly. AFP

With reports suggesting that President Pranab Mukherjee may give ten more days to the Assembly to discuss the draft Andhra Pradesh Re-organisation Bill, 2013 and return it, the session may be extended by that many days beyond 23 January when it is originally scheduled to conclude.

However, the state government is yet to make a formal request to the President to extend the session for returning the draft Bill but official sources said a request could be sent to the Centre on 20 January.

Thousands of "amendments" were proposed to all clauses of the draft Bill by legislators from coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema regions.

The Seemaandhra legislators primarily proposed "deletion" of Clause 1 that, according to the draft Bill, stands for enactment of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, in effect seeking to keep the state united.

The Telangana side too sought several changes in the draft Bill but termed them "views\suggestions."

The Telangana MLAs predominantly opposed the clause 8 that seeks to vest decisive powers with the "common Governor" and clause 5 (1) that makes Hyderabad the "common capital" for a period not exceeding ten years.

The Telangana Congress suggested that Hyderabad may be made the common capital temporarily for a period not exceeding ten years or till completion of the new capital for residuary state, whichever is earlier.

The Telangana Rashtra Samiti wanted Hyderabad as common capital only for a period of three years. These amendments will now have to be put to vote, which is expected to take a lot of time.

The Telangana side, however, is opposed to voting on the clauses.

PTI


Will AAP be another movement that flourished and failed?

If AAP was India's first genuine post-independence mass movement that acquired political acceptance faster than anybody else, the party appears to be heading for a downfall sooner than what most cynics predicted.

An AAP volunteer . AFP

An AAP volunteer . AFP

It's not the dissident voices from within the party, such as that of Vinod Kumar Binny and Tina Sharma who seemed to be disgruntled for not getting posts of power, nor the ambitious new recruits in other parts of the country who are speaking out of line, that will discredit the movement, but the inability of the AAP top leadership in regulating its growth that ordinary people in Delhi have set off.

Without a thoughtful intervention, the party is at the risk of an implosion that will yet again show the world that mass movements are inherently prone to decline or decay after their romantic rise.

If the African National Congress (ANC), that began as a mass uprising against apartheid and subsequently a hugely successful political formation, can flounder despite Nelson Mandela and a wider liberation movement that had both trade unions and the Left, the AAP cannot be an exception. In fact, the failure of ANC's future was evident after the first democratic elections itself.

The main reason for the ANC's decline was that the party was burdened by trust, responsibility and expectations of governance while it couldn't continue its mass movement towards economic freedom. The failures of Mandela's followers Thabo Mbeki and the current President Jacob Zuma are examples of how power kills political movements and even fails and corrupts its leadership. The country in fact is in desperate need for another uprising against inequality, corruption, unemployment and poor governance, issues that ANC once stood for.

During the romantic uprising of AAP, its leaders did compare their party with ANC. One idea that the AAP camp spoke of was the broad nation-wide alliances that the ANC had forged. In its efforts to scale up, the AAP also wanted to be a confederation of people's movements across the country.

Without alternatives to oppose them, the ANC is still in power and is most likely to win the next round of elections too; but the AAP can be thrown out of its dream ride faster, not just because of its wily rivals such as the BJP and the Congress, but because it's on a cruise that it has no control over. The party was not ready for power in Delhi, but went for it unprepared and it wanted to expand across the country in a phased manner, but got carried away by the Delhi results and enthusiasm of urban Indians.

Now, they have a double burden of meeting the sky-high expectations that they themselves had set in Delhi, and scaling up across India to fight in over 400 Lok Sabha seats. For an urban mass movement of common people, with an organisational history of less than a year, this is unreal and absurdly ambitious. The odds are heavily against them. The biggest threat will be the antecedents of people and movements that join the AAP.

This is the problem with petty bourgeoisie democracy - even those who want to move away from the beaten track falls in line sooner than later. The Congress, before independence was an exciting mass movement, which in no time fell into utter decadence and a never-ending dynasty; and the communists, who interestingly had an AAP-lingo in the 1960s, fell into the trap of violence, capital, opportunistic secularism, and a third front substitute to the BJP and the Congress.

Although not to second-guess AAP's political future, it will be interesting to look at what a CPM central committee resolution said in 1967: "the main pillar of out tactics is a united front from below. That is so because there is a powerful urge for unity in the masses" and the "Communists have to strengthen this unity and turn it into an active political force." Replace the communists with AAP, you get its political trajectory so far. And look at where the CPM is now.

"In India any revolution can succeed only under the direct leadership of the proletariat, with cities as the leading centre of revolution," was the CPI's take. Kejriwal swears by the leadership of "aam aadmi" (not too different from the proletariat) and AAP is a city phenomenon.

Why do mass movements fail?

American sociologists Herbert Blumer, a pioneer in the study of social movements, had identified for stages in the lifecycle of such movements: social ferment, popular excitement, formalisation, and institutionalisation. We have witnessed the social ferment, popular excitement and the formalisation in the journey of AAP so far. What they are failing is in the institutionalisation, which incidentally also includes its running the government in Delhi and the ambitious scale up across the country.

The first three promising and romantic steps were co-created with the people, but for the last stage which will define their future, the AAP is all alone and are under tremendous scrutiny. It's a tedious job that it has to deliver as a government while dealing with the trappings of petty bourgeoisie politics - "aam aadmis" such as Binny and Sharma and thousands of others asking for positions of power, people such as Captain Gopinath defining what AAP should be, and factions in Tamil Nadu openly fighting for authority.

Scholars who worked on Blumer's postulates redefined his classification further. According to them, the four stages of mass movements are these: emergence, coalescence, bureaucratisation, and DECLINE!

For the AAP, the emergence and coalescence have been a dream ride while bureaucratisation is proving to be quite messy. Unless it takes urgent steps, it will slip into decline in no time.

The AAP has history and the work of others to learn from. It should realise that even with the best intentions, it cannot have default immunity to the pitfalls of petty bourgeoisie politics. Going by the rate at which it's handling governance in Delhi and the speed with which it's filling its ranks, it certainly appears to be in trouble. When even the natural course of mass movements gaining political legitimacy fails, artificially accelerating the process is as risky as getting too rich too soon.


After comments against Shinde, RK Singh loses personal staff

New Delhi: Days after he attacked Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde, former Home Secretary R K Singh has been stripped of his personal staff by the government.

Nearly a dozen government employees, mostly drawn from different paramilitary forces, who were retained by Singh after his retirement have been asked to report to their respective organisations immediately, sources said.

The personnel are engaged in various secretarial work and  domestic chores. A retired bureaucrat is not allowed to retain personal staff.

RK Singh has made comments against Shinde. Image courtesy: IBNlive

RK Singh has made comments against Shinde. Image courtesy: IBNlive

However, the former Home Secretary, who retired on June 30 last year and joined the BJP recently, will continue to enjoy the security cover of the Delhi Police, the sources
said.

Efforts to elicit a response from Singh did not fructify immediately. He did not respond to telephone calls nor did he reply to text message.

The action from the Home Ministry came days after Singh claimed that Shinde had interfered with the transfers and postings of Delhi Police.

He has also accused Shinde of having given wrong information in the matter of the US helping India bring back underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.

The former bureaucrat also remarked that Shinde was not fit to be Home Minister and said Finance Minister P Chidambaram, who is a former Home Minister, was "100 times better" than him.

Singh joined BJP in December of last year and may contest the Lok Sabha polls from Bihar.

PTI


AAP does not rule out Kejriwal contesting Lok Sabha polls

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party on Tursday did not rule out Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal contesting the Lok Sabha polls, with an AAP leader saying no decision has been taken on whether Delhi MLAs or the chief minister would be in fray.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. AFP

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. AFP

"No formal decision has been taken by the election committee on whether any (AAP) MLA would not contest Lok Sabha elections," Yogendra Yadav said.

"The party has also not taken any decision that Arvind Kejriwal will not contest elections," he said, indicating that the Delhi chief minister may be in the race for Prime Minister's post if the party is in a position to form the government.

Kejriwal had earlier said that he would not contest the Lok Sabha elections and no AAP MLA would be allowed to fight the polls. When asked by reporters over Kejriwal's statements, Yadav said, "He said this on basis that if MLAs are interested in contesting the Lok Sabha polls then how are we going to run the government. Anyways, we just have 28 MLAs."

PTI


Lok Sabha polls: Why AAP can never defeat Rahul in Amethi

Sitting on the stage of his Jan Vishwas rally in Amethi, AAP leader Kumar Vishwas passionately addressed his audience of almost 12 thousand people.

"With every egg and shoe that will be thrown at me, 1000 votes from Amethi will turn to AAP," Vishwas said at one point in his speech.

A loud cheer rose from the crowd when he said it. But beyond the rally and SUVs full of supporters from across districts in the Awadh region, Amethi did not seem very keen to turn to Viswas or the Aam Aadmi Party by the thousands. Most of them seemed to set to entrust their vote with their 'prince' again.

A Congress citadel in UP, Amethi, the constituency has barely given anyone else a chance since 1967. It has been represented by non-Congress MPs only for nine years. The only time the constituency showed the door to a Gandhi was in 1977, when Sanjay Gandhi lost as the Janata Party wave swept the country and subsequently formed the government at the Centre.

But in 2014, after 10 years of a Congress-led UPA government and despite widespread anti-incumbency across the nation, Amethi is barely bothering to look for an alternative to its 'prince'. Rahul Gandhi still enjoys unanimous support from the voters in his constituency.

Can anyone really challenge Rahul Gandhi in Amethi? PTI

Can anyone really challenge Rahul Gandhi in Amethi? Representational  image. PTI image

"Amethi has been with the Gandhis and rallies like these (Vishwas's) are barely going to dent the popularity that Rahul Gandhi enjoys here, just like his father did," Amit Sahani, a businessman from Gauriganj who came to attend the AAP leader's speech despite a bitterly cold winter morning, said.

During the rally, Vishwas told people to 'break free from the shackles and slavery of the Gandhi dynasty'. In Amethi, a majority of the voters have been voting for the Congress party for the last three to four generations.

"My father and grandfather both were workers for the Congress party, and never in an election has a single vote from our family gone to any other party," said Mudassar Ali, a resident of Bhoi.

However, Ali said that the present generation, that includes his son, are more practical than his.

"The young now understand that voting should be done on the basis of the work done by our politicians," he said.

Residents of Amethi prefer to stick with the Gandhis also because they believe they will not be able to enjoy the same clout with any other leader that they enjoy with the 'first family' of the Congress.

"What else does Amethi have? The land here is intensely alkaline and is no good for agriculture. No major industry is there here, the only way for Amethi to stay relevant is to stick with the Gandhis," said a journalist from a national daily, who came from Lucknow to attend the AAP rally.

"People here gets preference when it come to government jobs. Lots of young people in the Army and security forces are from Amethi. So the people of Amethi will not let it go," he said.

The number of Muslim votes in Amethi is another reason that will keep Rahul Gandhi's hopes up of avoiding an upset in the run up to the upcoming election. Muslims constitute almost 20 percent of Amethi's total voter base. A majority of them are Sunnis, who have been voting for the Congress for last four decades.

"SP holds a huge chunk of the Muslim votes in the state, but in Amethi, and more or less in the Awadh region, the traditional Muslim voters have remained with the Congress," said Tauquir Raza, the chief cleric of UP Millat Commission, who has just stopped backing the Samajwadi Party after a row over the riots in Muzaffarnagar.

But the the ghost of 1977 still troubles the Congress in Amethi. Vishwas and AAP's Sanjay Singh pointed it out to their audience at the rally. But the people of Amethi say that the 1977 defeat had barely anything to do with the anti- Congress wave.

"It was all because of Sanjay Gandhi. Voters were utterly angry with him for his sterilisation policies and the forceful implementation of it," Mohammad Anwar, a resident of Jamo, said.

"That year not a single Muslim vote went to Congress. They forcefully sterilised hundreds of young people and no one took that in right spirit," Anwar, a lawyer, said.

There are also many in Amethi, who believe that Rahul Gandhi is merely riding the wave of support for his father Rajiv.

"Rajiv was a leader who sat in Delhi but always had Amethi in his attention, but compared to that Rahul has barely spoken about the constituency," a district leader of the Congress in Amethi said, on condition of anonymity.

"The young people don't feel the same way as their fathers," he said.

However, for the youth of Amethi, the image of Rahul Gandhi is still that of a youth leader when compared to the politicians from the Samajwadi Party or Bahujan Samaj Party.

"It's like an aura. He lives in Delhi and the embodiment of everything that is right. But the SP or BSP politicians are not polished. They don't inspire people and are crass in their talking and manners," Jitendra Jain, a 29-year-old, said.

"With Akhilesh we thought that would change and the expectation reflected in the election results, but barely anything changed," he said.

A major factor in Rahul Gandhi's favour is also that in a state which has made Congress almost redundant in the last couple of decades, the Congress Vice President has always been in the opposition.

"Nothing woos people more than an opposing voice to the incumbent regime, especially if it is as worthless as the SP government. And Rahul Gandhi has spoken and taken a stance after the (Muzaffarnagar) riots, whereas the leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party are barely taking on the Samajwadi Party government. This will definitely make Rahul look like a articulate man," Hari Vansh, an expert on UP politics and editor of a national daily, said.


Cong leader files case against Ramdev for remarks on Sonia, Rahul

Bhagalpur (Bihar): A Congress leader has filed a complaint against yoga guru Ramdev and his associates for his alleged comments, against party President Sonia Gandhi and Vice-President Rahul Gandhi, made here on Tuesday, sources said today.

Bhagalpur district Congress General Secretary Bipin Bihari Yadav filed the complaint against Ramdev, four officials of his Patanjali Yoga Samiti and supporters in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) R C Malviya yesterday, they said.

ramdev2The court has fixed January 23 as the date of hearing.

In his complaint, Yadav alleged that Ramdev's "baseless" remarks against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, made during a day-long deliberation on yogic philosophy here on Tuesday, have hurt sentiments of party workers, they said.

He also alleged that when his party workers demanded an apology from Ramdev for his "comments" on Sonia and Rahul, the yoga guru instigated his supporters to get into a clash with Congress workers at the Bhagalpur Railway station on Tuesday evening which left four injured, sources said.

Ramdev, who visited Bhagalpur as a part of his "Sampark Samvad", had said that he would go in for extensive campaigning in Rai Bareili and Amethi against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi for the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls.

PTI


Case filed against Baba Ramdev for ‘remarks’ on Sonia, Rahul

Bhagalpur (Bihar): A Congress leader has filed a complaint against yoga guru Baba Ramdev and his associates for his alleged comments, against party President Sonia Gandhi and Vice-President Rahul Gandhi, made here on Tuesday, sources said today.

Yoga guru Baba Ramdev

Yoga guru Baba Ramdev

Bhagalpur district Congress General Secretary Bipin Bihari Yadav filed the complaint against Ramdev, four officials of his Patanjali Yoga Samiti and supporters in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) R C Malviya yesterday, they said.

The court has fixed January 23 as the date of hearing.

In his complaint, Yadav alleged that Ramdev's "baseless" remarks against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, made during a day-long deliberation on yogic philosophy here on Tuesday, have hurt sentiments of party workers, they said.

He also alleged that when his party workers demanded an apology from Ramdev for his "comments" on Sonia and Rahul, the yoga guru instigated his supporters to get into a clash with Congress workers at the Bhagalpur Railway station on Tuesday evening which left four injured, sources said.

Ramdev, who visited Bhagalpur as a part of his "Sampark Samvad", had said that he would go in for extensive campaigning in Rai Bareili and Amethi against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi for the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls.

PTI


Karunanidhi says no alliance talks for LS polls were held with DMDK

Chennai: DMK chief M Karunanidhi, who had welcomed a prospective alliance with DMDK for the Lok Sabha polls, today said no talks was held in this regard.

"No talks had been held; so there is no question of any improvement," he told reporters here when asked if there were any improvement in talks between the two parties.

M Karunanidhi. PTI

M Karunanidhi. PTI

Karunanidhi's remarks come in the wake of reports in a section of media that DMK was holding alliance discussions with DMDK for the coming Lok Sabha polls.

Recently, the 90 year-old leader had welcomed the idea of the two parties striking an electoral tie-up and had even publicly rapped his Madurai-based son and former Union Minister M K Alagiri for opining against the alliance.

Alagiri's younger brother M K Stalin is favourably disposed towards a DMK-DMDK tie-up.

PTI


The AAP’s product is confused, trust is eroding

We've seen it before – a product that doesn't quite match up to the expectations that the advertising seemed to suggest or promise or advertising that seems to target a particular constituency but the consumer finds that, when he actually sees or experiences the product, it was not quite what he expected.

In the short time since the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) took charge of Delhi, what we see is a nightmare as far as product-promise mismatch is concerned.

At the most fundamental level, the AAP was advertised as the party that would make the country corruption-free. As far as their Delhi campaign was concerned, the Delhi voter thought that he or she was buying a non-corrupt party, and that he or she would never again be in a situation where anyone asked for a bribe. It was much like the expectations of a woman who buys mosquito repellent and uses it once she gets home. Now, she expects to be free from the nuisance of the mosquito.

The AAP seemed to choose the issue of corruption carefully.

Representational image. Reuters

Representational image. Reuters

"Fortunately for us, corruption is an issue that cuts across classes. Corruption is an illness which affects people in different ways. But all of them recognize the illness with the same name. So, a very powerful, well to do businessman thinks he is a victim of corruption. And a rickshaw puller also feels he is a victim of corruption. So corruption is an issue that cuts across classes. For us to carry that issue was actually the real strength," AAP's Yogendra Yadav told Storyboard's Pavni Mittal in an interview.

Back to the mosquito repellent example. When a consumer makes a choice of a mosquito repellent brand, he or she needs to believe that the company making the repellent is capable of keeping a promise, will use ingredients that are safe, and so on.

When the AAP promised to remove corruption, it was a believable promise. The AAP was more trusted with this promise than any other brand was. Imagine the Congress or the BJP making such a promise – it would have been laughable, to say the least.

It was when the AAP decided to enter electoral politics in general and the Delhi elections in particular that they realised that they needed to be more than a corruption repellent – they needed to address issues such as the water problem, the electricity problem, housing, safety of women and so on.

Imagine a mosquito repellent having to also be a detergent, a body soap, a shampoo and a hair oil. While that is certainly an exaggeration, it perhaps describes the challenge that the AAP faced – and it seems that the solution that the AAP found was found wanting.

Astonishingly, they thought that all this was possible – and more. The AAP, for example, decided that, in addition to addressing the issues mentioned above, they would also take a position on FDI in retail, without quite thinking through the implications. The result is this headline in The Times of India yesterday: 'Blocking retail FDI to rob India of 1 crore jobs.'

The article tells it all:

The refusal by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) to allow foreign retailers to set up shop in the national capital will block creation of new jobs, dash hopes for consumers and create policy uncertainty for global chains."

The move comes at a time when several global retailers led by Tesco are planning to enter the multi-brand retail sector, which has the potential to add strength to the tentative economic recovery underway.

"The red flag for multi-brand retail will also mean a blow to the battle to tame high prices hurting the common man. Hopes of setting up modern warehouses to cut out massive wastage of fruits and vegetables will be put on the backburner and also delay revival in the real estate sector banking on global retailers."

Each day, there is more focus on issues unrelated to corruption – and the AAP seems to be either bumbling along or, simply failing.

It is a larger worry when, in their first demonstration of the commitment to eradicate corruption, they came a cropper and had to flip-flop on a decision.

After his first 'janta darbar' ended in a total chaos, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said there would be no such public meets and the government will open new channels where people can report their grievances online, via post and through calls.

The trust is also collapsing, as more faces of the AAP are exposed.

"This is the situation that we start with. Either we invent 17 known faces within a few weeks, which we can't. Or we make use of the one credible face that we have," Yogendra Yadav said when asked about why the entire Delhi campaign focused on Arvind Kejriwal.

Day before yesterday we saw the AAP getting into trouble with another face.

The Aam Aadmi Party-led Delhi government faced its first embarrassment with regard to a Cabinet member when allegations of its law minister Somnath Bharti influencing a witness surfaced on Tuesday. This morning we have seen the Binny fiasco.

So not only is the product being asked to do things it wasn't designed to do, the trust in the manufacturer is being eroded as well. This is going to be a tall mountain to climb for the AAP.


AAP downplays Captain Gopinath’s ‘populist comment’ on decision against FDI

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) today downplayed Air Deccan founder Captain Gopinath's comments against its government's decision to reject FDI in retail in
Delhi, saying members can have different opinions.

Senior party leader and member of the national executive committee Yogendra Yadav said that the party had over 1.5 million members and it was only the opinion of the party officer bearers and spokespersons that was relevant.

Captain Gopinath. Reuters

Captain Gopinath. Reuters

"We came to know that many people (popular personalities from different fields including Captain Gopinath) have become the members of the Aam Aadmi Party.
"It would be an extraordinary expectation to assume that all those 1.5 million members of the Aam Aadmi Party will haveconsensus on any major issue. Of these 1.5 million members, some are office bearers, some are official spokespersons. If they say something then that is the party's line," Yadav said.

Gopinath yesterday had criticised the Delhi's government decision of not allowing FDI in retail. He said that the party was in danger of being branded like other political parties of resorting to populist measures and opposing for the sake of opposing.

Yadav added that AAP welcomed the expectations and public focus because this what will keep the government on its toes and that the party is committed to seeking public opinion on any major issue.

PTI


Rahul Gandhi is a bird but Narendra Modi is a tiger: Maneka Gandhi

New Delhi: BJP MP Maneka Gandhi on Thursday hit out at the Gandhi family and said Rahul Gandhi was no match for BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi.

Congress VP Rahul Gandhi and BJP PM candidate Narendra Modi

Congress VP Rahul Gandhi and BJP PM candidate Narendra Modi

She termed Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi a bird as compared to Modi, whom she described as a tiger.

The wife of late Sanjay Gandhi and Lok Sabha MP from Aonla in Uttar Pradesh, said that even though Manmohan Singh was the Prime Minister, the country has been run by Rahul and Sonia Gandhi for the last 10 years.

The Congress party needs a revamp and no one can save it in its present condition, she told AajTak.

She also attacked Priyanka Gandhi, saying her glamour would not work in the upcoming general elections.

PTI


Virbhadra Singh sues BJP’s Jaitley for malicious campaign against him

Shimla: Under attack from BJP on corruption charges, Himachal Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh on Thursday filed three defamation cases against Arun Jaitley and other party leaders, accusing them of unleashing a malicious campaign against him and his family through media to tarnish his image.

Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh. PTI

Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh. PTI

The Congress leader said he has filed a defamation case under Section 499 of IPC against Jaitley, Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha, and former state chief minister P K Dhumal and two separate petitions against BJP MP Anurag Thakur and Arun Dhumal, son of PK Dhumal, in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Shimla, Jyotsana Dhadwal.

The CJM fixed the hearing on 15 February.

Alleging political vendetta against him, 79-year-old Virbhadra Singh said it was not for the first time that he had been personally targeted by Dhumal.

He said that when he came to power there were numerous complaints against Dhumal and other BJP leaders. But he decided "not to continue the bad practice of political vendetta and victimisation started by Dhumal as he did not want make Himachal Pradesh another Punjab or Tamil Nadu. Not even a single case was registered against BJP leaders," he said.

Singh went to the districts courts near Chakkar accompanied by some ministers and supporters and after filing the defamation complaints addressed the media in the presence of ministerial colleagues, chairpersons of boards and corporation and other senior Congress leaders.

Singh claimed that during his first term, Dhumal implicated him in Sagar Kattha case and the CD case was filed during the last term but he was exonerated by the court both the times.

"Dhumal Government submitted a 24-point charge sheet against me to the CBI in 1998. I was again given a clean chit by the agency after investigations at a time when NDA was in power at the centre," he told reporters.

Jaitley had written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh alleging that Virbhadra Singh had taken bribe from a private power company and had demanded a CBI inquiry, calling it an "open and shut case of corruption", but the Chief Minister had denied the charges and threatened to sue him.

Jaitley had dared the CM to file the defamation case and had said he would cross examine him in court on each of the charges.

PTI


Rahul Gandhi has all the credentials for becoming PM: Lalu

Patna: Rashtriya Janata Dal chief Lalu Prasad today said Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi has all the credentials for becoming the country's prime minister and would prove much better than 'communal' Narendra Modi.

"Kya kammi hain unme Pradhan Mantri banane me? (does he lack any quality to become Prime Minister?)... He has all the qualities for the high post," Prasad told reporters here.

lalu_PTI2"Has he instigated any communal riot or indulged in crime against any community?" the RJD chief asked rating Gandhi higher than the BJP's prime ministerial nominee, Modi.

Prasad, who has been rooting for a tie up with Congress in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections said he might be dubbed a 'sycophant' for praising Gandhi but it is a "fact" that Gandhi is "Prime Minister material".

On Yoga-guru Ramdev calling him 'Kans' for not supporting fellow backward caste leader Modi for the high post, Prasad said "Ramdev is going on the path of Asaram and will meet the same fate."

PTI


BJP, Left not ready to buy Tharoors’ ‘all’s well’ statement

Thiruvananthapuram: Union Minister Shashi Tharoor and wife Sunanda Pushkar said Thursday that all is well with them. However, the Left and the BJP in Kerala said there was need for follow-up on tweets by the minister's wife.

Tharoor is union Minister of State for Human Resource Development, and represents state capital Thiruvananthapuram in the Lok Sabha.

Kerala BJP president V. Muraleedharan Thursday told reporters that with allegations being levelled by his own wife about his connections with a Pakistani woman, a journalist allegedly also an agent of the Inter-Intelligence Service (ISI), the need of the hour was that Tharoor be ousted from the cabinet.

"The allegation of Tharoor's links with a Pakistani lady has come from his own wife, and hence it is all the more serious. He should be immediately ousted from the cabinet," Muraleedharan said.

Shashi Thaoor. AFP.

Shashi Thaoor. AFP.

Communist Party of India-Marxist politburo member Kodiyeri Balakrishnan said the allegations against Tharoor are very serious, and a detailed probe is necessary to reveal the truth.

"It is appropriate that a detailed probe into what has surfaced be done, at the earliest," Balakrishnan told reporters Thursday.

The Tharoors, in a joint statement Thursday posted on Facebook, said they were distressed by the unseemly controversy over some "unauthorised tweets" from their Twitter accounts.

"Various distorted accounts of comments allegedly made by Sunanda have appeared in the press. It appears that some personal and private comments responding to these unauthorised tweets -- comments that were not intended for publication -- have been misrepresented and led to some erroneous conclusions," they said.

"We wish to stress that we are happily married and intend to remain that way. Sunanda has been ill and hospitalised this week and is seeking to rest. We would be grateful if the media respects our privacy," the joint statement said.

Tharoor's wife Wednesday posted on Twitter: "Our accounts have not been hacked and I have been sending out these tweets. I cannot tolerate this. This is a Pakistani woman who is an ISI agent, and she is stalking my husband. And you know how men are."

Mehr Tarar, a Pakistani journalist who has been in touch with Tharoor, expressed surprise over the controversy and tweeted: "I know Shashi Tharoor and respect him greatly. Have tweeted/written about it openly. Feel awful about what is being tweeted."

The controversy comes at a time when Tharoor, who won the Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha seat in the 2009 Lok Sabha polls, is set to be named Congress party candidate in the upcoming Lok Sabha polls too.

IANS


Rahul Gandhi is a bird, Narendra Modi is a tiger: Maneka Gandhi

New Delhi: BJP MP Maneka Gandhi today hit out at the Gandhi family and said Rahul Gandhi was no match for BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi.

She termed Congress Vice-President Rahul Gandhi a bird as compared to Modi, whom she described as a tiger.

Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi. PTI

Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi. PTI

The wife of the late Sanjay Gandhi and the Lok Sabha MP from Aonla in Uttar Pradesh, said that even though Manmohan Singh was the Prime Minister, the country has been run by Rahul and Sonia Gandhi for the last 10 years.

The Congress party needs a revamp and no one can save it in its present condition, she told AajTak, the channel said in a release.

She also attacked Priyanka Gandhi, saying her glamour would not work in the upcoming general elections.

PTI


Write off Congress, Rahul at your own risk, history is on their side

Rahul Gandhi does not exude a lot of promise. His leadership has been uninspiring, and this could well be an understatement. Under him, the party has been losing one big state after the other. While he has diagnosed the party's weaknesses correctly, none of his efforts to set things right has yielded positive results so far.

The organisation is crumbling everywhere and the party workers remain demoralised. To compound the misery, there's a new outfit on the political block threatening to appropriate the party's support base across the country. Will his elevation as the prime ministerial candidate make the ground reality any different?

Let's put it in a more blunt way: will he be presiding over the demise of the Congress? The compulsive obsessive 'dynasty' haters –the Gandhi 'family' baiters if you please – know the answer already. Actually, they have known it since decades. They have been predicting the political end of the 'family' since the late 1960s, the period Indira Gandhi got into a bruising battle with the 'Syndicate' and established herself as a political heavyweight through the post-Narasimha Rao times when Sonia Gandhi took charge of the party.

Can Rahul Gandhi still bring the party back from the brink? PTI

Can Rahul Gandhi still bring the party back from the brink? PTI

However, despite their grim forecast and premature political obituaries, neither has the 'family' disappeared from the map nor has the Congress withered away. If they are busy making the same prediction all over again, good luck to them.

The perennial optimists - they are more within the Congress than outside it - see Rahul as the great hope, the man who will recreate the glory days of the party soon. They are creatures of the past and refuse to admit that the party is getting pushed to the margins in the political arena. They will not acknowledge that the Gandhi name no more draws votes and the country has moved on.

Their argument goes thus: Didn't the party revive itself in the aftermath of the Emergency in the late 70s? Didn't it reinvent itself post 1996? Didn't it learn the coalition game to return to power in 2004 and 2009? The party has weathered crises earlier and this time too it will rise to the challenge. Of course, all this will take place, as usual, under the leadership of some member of the 'family' or the other.

Now, let's get back to the first question: will Rahul make any difference to the party's fortune as the prime minister candidate – this is assuming that he would be announced as it on 17 January? Frankly, it is difficult to see how. We have discussed some of his problems in the beginning. His elevation would pit him directly against BJP's Narenda Modi, who is miles ahead in wooing people across segments. Modi has also managed to create the public perception that he is a strong leader capable of ending the climate of uncertainty in the country.

In contrast, the perception of Rahul as a leader is largely negative and he certainly has a lot of catching up to do to even come close to Modi, let alone surpass him. We still haven't discussed his lack of experience in administrative matters and visible lack of clarity on matters of national importance. Of course, as the Modi experience reveals, there is nothing that a well-organised promotional campaign cannot change.

However, the fundamental question is what message would the Congress be conveying to the electorate by making him the prime minister candidate? Just calling him young and decisive won't be enough. Probably we need to wait for the party's ad blitzkrieg and Rahul's speeches in the coming days to understand things better.

For now, let's keep our fingers crossed. Going by the record of the Congress in striking back when the chips are down, it would be premature to write off both Rahul and the party. And yes, the observers must take note; neither the 'dynasty' nor the Congress are going to wither away any time soon.


Will AAP be a mass movement that flourished and failed?

If AAP was India's first genuine post-independence mass movement that acquired political acceptance faster than anybody else, the party appears to be heading for a downfall sooner than what most cynics predicted.

An AAP volunteer . AFP

An AAP volunteer . AFP

It's not the dissident voices from within the party, such as that of Vinod Kumar Binny and Tina Sharma who seemed to be disgruntled for not getting posts of power, nor the ambitious new recruits in other parts of the country who are speaking out of line, that will discredit the movement, but the inability of the AAP top leadership in regulating its growth that ordinary people in Delhi have set off.

Without a thoughtful intervention, the party is at the risk of an implosion that will yet again show the world that mass movements are inherently prone to decline or decay after their romantic rise.

If the African National Congress (ANC), that began as a mass uprising against apartheid and subsequently a hugely successful political formation, can flounder despite Nelson Mandela and a wider liberation movement that had both trade unions and the Left, the AAP cannot be an exception. In fact, the failure of ANC's future was evident after the first democratic elections itself.

The main reason for the ANC's decline was that the party was burdened by trust, responsibility and expectations of governance while it couldn't continue its mass movement towards economic freedom. The failures of Mandela's followers Thabo Mbeki and the current President Jacob Zuma are examples of how power kills political movements and even fails and corrupts its leadership. The country in fact is in desperate need for another uprising against inequality, corruption, unemployment and poor governance, issues that ANC once stood for.

During the romantic uprising of AAP, its leaders did compare their party with ANC. One idea that the AAP camp spoke of was the broad nation-wide alliances that the ANC had forged. In its efforts to scale up, the AAP also wanted to be a confederation of people's movements across the country.

Without alternatives to oppose them, the ANC is still in power and is most likely to win the next round of elections too; but the AAP can be thrown out of its dream ride faster, not just because of its wily rivals such as the BJP and the Congress, but because it's on a cruise that it has no control over. The party was not ready for power in Delhi, but went for it unprepared and it wanted to expand across the country in a phased manner, but got carried away by the Delhi results and enthusiasm of urban Indians.

Now, they have a double burden of meeting the sky-high expectations that they themselves had set in Delhi, and scaling up across India to fight in over 400 Lok Sabha seats. For an urban mass movement of common people, with an organisational history of less than a year, this is unreal and absurdly ambitious. The odds are heavily against them. The biggest threat will be the antecedents of people and movements that join the AAP.

This is the problem with petty bourgeoisie democracy - even those who want to move away from the beaten track falls in line sooner than later. The Congress, before independence was an exciting mass movement, which in no time fell into utter decadence and a never-ending dynasty; and the communists, who interestingly had an AAP-lingo in the 1960s, fell into the trap of violence, capital, opportunistic secularism, and a third front substitute to the BJP and the Congress.

Although not to second-guess AAP's political future, it will be interesting to look at what a CPM central committee resolution said in 1967: "the main pillar of out tactics is a united front from below. That is so because there is a powerful urge for unity in the masses" and the "Communists have to strengthen this unity and turn it into an active political force." Replace the communists with AAP, you get its political trajectory so far. And look at where the CPM is now.

"In India any revolution can succeed only under the direct leadership of the proletariat, with cities as the leading centre of revolution," was the CPI's take. Kejriwal swears by the leadership of "aam aadmi" (not too different from the proletariat) and AAP is a city phenomenon.

Why do mass movements fail?

American sociologists Herbert Blumer, a pioneer in the study of social movements, had identified for stages in the lifecycle of such movements: social ferment, popular excitement, formalisation, and institutionalisation. We have witnessed the social ferment, popular excitement and the formalisation in the journey of AAP so far. What they are failing is in the institutionalisation, which incidentally also includes its running the government in Delhi and the ambitious scale up across the country.

The first three promising and romantic steps were co-created with the people, but for the last stage which will define their future, the AAP is all alone and are under tremendous scrutiny. It's a tedious job that it has to deliver as a government while dealing with the trappings of petty bourgeoisie politics - "aam aadmis" such as Binny and Sharma and thousands of others asking for positions of power, people such as Captain Gopinath defining what AAP should be, and factions in Tamil Nadu openly fighting for authority.

Scholars who worked on Blumer's postulates redefined his classification further. According to them, the four stages of mass movements are these: emergence, coalescence, bureaucratisation, and DECLINE!

For the AAP, the emergence and coalescence have been a dream ride while bureaucratisation is proving to be quite messy. Unless it takes urgent steps, it will slip into decline in no time.

The AAP has history and the work of others to learn from. It should realise that even with the best intentions, it cannot have default immunity to the pitfalls of petty bourgeoisie politics. Going by the rate at which it's handling governance in Delhi and the speed with which it's filling its ranks, it certainly appears to be in trouble. When even the natural course of mass movements gaining political legitimacy fails, artificially accelerating the process is as risky as getting too rich too soon.


Rahul Gandhi is Congress’s PM candidate: Oscar Fernandes

New Delhi: Ahead of the crucial AICC session tomorrow, Union Minister Oscar Fernandes today said Rahul Gandhi is Congress candidate for Prime Ministership even as suspense remains on whether the party will formally anoint him as PM nominee for the Lok Sabha polls.

"Whether he (Rahul) accepts or not, he is our Prime Ministerial candidate. He will certainly accept (the responsibility), this is my opinion," the Road Transport Minister told reporters here.

Rahul Gandhi. PTI image

Rahul Gandhi. PTI image

"Wait till tomorrow," Fernandes said when asked whether the announcement of Rahul Gandhi's candidature for the top post will be made tomorrow.

He also said that there is no difference of opinion among senior party leaders on it. "No, no differences... we all are very happy."

To a specific question as to how his name can be formally announced as the party's PM candidate amid different opinions
in Congress on it, Fernades, who has held key positions in party organidsation for long, insisted, "It has to be done."

The remarks of the senior party leader are significant as they come on a day when Congress Working Committee is meeting to take a final view on the issue ahead of the AICC meeting tomorrow.

In last few days, there have been contradictory signals from the party with some leaders indicating that he should be named the PM candidate before the polls while few others advocating a word of caution on it.

Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia also hoped that such an announcement could be made at the AICC meeting.

PTI


Will AAP also be a mass movement that flourished and failed?

If AAP was India's first genuine post-independence mass movement that acquired political acceptance faster than anybody else, the party appears to be heading for a downfall sooner than what most cynics predicted.

An AAP volunteer . AFP

An AAP volunteer . AFP

It's not the dissident voices from within the party, such as that of Vinod Kumar Binny and Tina Sharma who seemed to be disgruntled for not getting posts of power, nor the ambitious new recruits in other parts of the country who are speaking out of line, that will discredit the movement, but the inability of the AAP top leadership in regulating its growth that ordinary people in Delhi have set off.

Without a thoughtful intervention, the party is at the risk of an implosion that will yet again show the world that mass movements are inherently prone to decline or decay after their romantic rise.

If the African National Congress (ANC), that began as a mass uprising against apartheid and subsequently a hugely successful political formation, can flounder despite Nelson Mandela and a wider liberation movement that had both trade unions and the Left, the AAP cannot be an exception. In fact, the failure of ANC's future was evident after the first democratic elections itself.

The main reason for the ANC's decline was that the party was burdened by trust, responsibility and expectations of governance while it couldn't continue its mass movement towards economic freedom. The failures of Mandela's followers Thabo Mbeki and the current President Jacob Zuma are examples of how power kills political movements and even fails and corrupts its leadership. The country in fact is in desperate need for another uprising against inequality, corruption, unemployment and poor governance, issues that ANC once stood for.

During the romantic uprising of AAP, its leaders did compare their party with ANC. One idea that the AAP camp spoke of was the broad nation-wide alliances that the ANC had forged. In its efforts to scale up, the AAP also wanted to be a confederation of people's movements across the country.

Without alternatives to oppose them, the ANC is still in power and is most likely to win the next round of elections too; but the AAP can be thrown out of its dream ride faster, not just because of its wily rivals such as the BJP and the Congress, but because it's on a cruise that it has no control over. The party was not ready for power in Delhi, but went for it unprepared and it wanted to expand across the country in a phased manner, but got carried away by the Delhi results and enthusiasm of urban Indians.

Now, they have a double burden of meeting the sky-high expectations that they themselves had set in Delhi, and scaling up across India to fight in over 400 Lok Sabha seats. For an urban mass movement of common people, with an organisational history of less than a year, this is unreal and absurdly ambitious. The odds are heavily against them. The biggest threat will be the antecedents of people and movements that join the AAP.

This is the problem with petty bourgeoisie democracy - even those who want to move away from the beaten track falls in line sooner than later. The Congress, before independence was an exciting mass movement, which in no time fell into utter decadence and a never-ending dynasty; and the communists, who interestingly had an AAP-lingo in the 1960s, fell into the trap of violence, capital, opportunistic secularism, and a third front substitute to the BJP and the Congress.

Although not to second-guess AAP's political future, it will be interesting to look at what a CPM central committee resolution said in 1967: "the main pillar of out tactics is a united front from below. That is so because there is a powerful urge for unity in the masses" and the "Communists have to strengthen this unity and turn it into an active political force." Replace the communists with AAP, you get its political trajectory so far. And look at where the CPM is now.

"In India any revolution can succeed only under the direct leadership of the proletariat, with cities as the leading centre of revolution," was the CPI's take. Kejriwal swears by the leadership of "aam aadmi" (not too different from the proletariat) and AAP is a city phenomenon.

Why do mass movements fail?

American sociologists Herbert Blumer, a pioneer in the study of social movements, had identified for stages in the lifecycle of such movements: social ferment, popular excitement, formalisation, and institutionalisation. We have witnessed the social ferment, popular excitement and the formalisation in the journey of AAP so far. What they are failing is in the institutionalisation, which incidentally also includes its running the government in Delhi and the ambitious scale up across the country.

The first three promising and romantic steps were co-created with the people, but for the last stage which will define their future, the AAP is all alone and are under tremendous scrutiny. It's a tedious job that it has to deliver as a government while dealing with the trappings of petty bourgeoisie politics - "aam aadmis" such as Binny and Sharma and thousands of others asking for positions of power, people such as Captain Gopinath defining what AAP should be, and factions in Tamil Nadu openly fighting for authority.

Scholars who worked on Blumer's postulates redefined his classification further. According to them, the four stages of mass movements are these: emergence, coalescence, bureaucratisation, and DECLINE!

For the AAP, the emergence and coalescence have been a dream ride while bureaucratisation is proving to be quite messy. Unless it takes urgent steps, it will slip into decline in no time.

The AAP has history and the work of others to learn from. It should realise that even with the best intentions, it cannot have default immunity to the pitfalls of petty bourgeoisie politics. Going by the rate at which it's handling governance in Delhi and the speed with which it's filling its ranks, it certainly appears to be in trouble. When even the natural course of mass movements gaining political legitimacy fails, artificially accelerating the process is as risky as getting too rich too soon.


AAP refutes allegations by Binny, says action will be taken against him

Ghaziabad: The Aam Aadmi Party today refuted the allegations levelled by its MLA Vinod Kumar Binny and said disciplinary action would be initiated against the legislator for "baseless accusations" against the party.

Addressing the media at AAP office here, senior leader Yogendra Yadav said the MLA was making "baseless accusations" against the party as he was denied a ticket for the Lok Sabha election.

Vindo Kumar Binny. PTI

Vindo Kumar Binny. PTI

"The party's Political Affairs Committee will initiate disciplinary action against Binny and accordingly a show cause notice will be issued to him," Yadav told reporters, adding, that party members could have different opinion but AAP will not tolerate indiscipline.

The sulking AAP MLA from Laxmi Nagar today accused the party of "cheating" people of Delhi by backtracking on its election promises and termed Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal a "dictator".

Binny addressed a press conference where he slammed the AAP leadership on a range of issues and said taking support of Congress to form the government was a "compromise on the party's principles".

"Today when Binny was speaking, it seemed that he was reading a script given to him by someone else. He has raised all those issue which the Leader of the Opposition Harsh Vardhan has been raising for the past few days.

"If he had any grievances against the party or its leaders, there are ways of expressing it. He could have taken up the issues in the party, but never did he raise such issues during any of the party meetings. It's very sad," Yadav said, adding, that Binny should not put personal ambition before the people's hopes and expectations. .Ghaziabad, Jan 16 (PTI) The Aam Aadmi Party today refuted the allegations levelled by its MLA Vinod Kumar Binny and said disciplinary action would be initiated against the legislator for "baseless accusations" against the party.

Addressing the media at AAP office here, senior leader Yogendra Yadav said the MLA was making "baseless accusations" against the party as he was denied a ticket for the Lok Sabha election.

"The party's Political Affairs Committee will initiate disciplinary action against Binny and accordingly a show cause notice will be issued to him," Yadav told reporters, adding, that party members could have different opinion but AAP will not tolerate indiscipline.

The sulking AAP MLA from Laxmi Nagar today accused the party of "cheating" people of Delhi by backtracking on its election promises and termed Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal a "dictator".

Binny addressed a press conference where he slammed the AAP leadership on a range of issues and said taking support of Congress to form the government was a "compromise on the party's principles".

"Today when Binny was speaking, it seemed that he was reading a script given to him by someone else. He has raised all those issue which the Leader of the Opposition Harsh Vardhan has been raising for the past few days.

"If he had any grievances against the party or its leaders, there are ways of expressing it. He could have taken up the issues in the party, but never did he raise such issues during any of the party meetings. It's very sad," Yadav said, adding, that Binny should not put personal ambition before the people's hopes and expectations.

PTI


Work to win all 40 Lok Sabha seats, Jayalalithaa tells AIADMK party workers

Chennai: Flaying Centre's "wrong economic policies" and calling for greater regional autonomy for better growth of states, AIADMK supremo and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa on Thursday once again exhorted her partymen to work to win all 40 Lok Sabha seats in the coming elections.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa.

"With this victory, AIADMK will become a massive power deciding the future of India," she said.

In her message to the party men ahead of AIADMK founder M G Ramachandran's birth anniversary on 17 January, she also took a dig at arch rival, DMK president M Karunanidhi, saying despite his party's participation in most union cabinets in the last 17 years, Tamil Nadu had not benefited much.

"The Indian republic would have been made stronger only if states were strengthened. A change of guard is required at the Centre for this; one that benefits Tamil Nadu and its people. Wrong economic policies being followed for 20 years should be changed and a new government that is compassionate in its approach towards people should come," she said.

Tamil Nadu, which she alleged had been perennially ignored for long by Centre, should get justice, she said.

If the state had to develop in all spheres and rank No.1 among other Indian states, "a Central government that respects our word should be formed," she said.

Urging her party men to work towards winning all the 40 seats, 39 in the state and one in Puducherry, she said that will be the best tribute to the party founder Ramachandran, fondly addressed as MGR.

PTI


RK Singh is now a BJP man, won’t react to his charges: Shinde

New Delhi: Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde on Thursday refused to react to RK Singh's allegations against him, saying he no longer considered the retired bureaucrat as being a former home secretary but saw him as a politician and BJP man.

Former Home Secretary RK Singh.

Former Home Secretary RK Singh.

"Singh is now a political man. His allegations are political in nature. He is now with BJP. I do not see him as a former home secretary but as a BJP man. I will not react to his allegations," he told reporters in New Delhi.

Singh has claimed that the home minister had allegedly interfered with the transfers and postings of Delhi Police. He has also accused Shinde of having given wrong information in the matter of the US helping India bring back underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.

Singh also remarked that Shinde was not fit to be Home Minister and said Chidambaram was "100 times better" than him.

Singh joined BJP in December last year and may contest the Lok Sabha polls from Bihar.

Shinde said his Congress party and ministerial colleagues had already reacted to Singh's allegations.

Congress has questioned the "opportunistic" and "low" behaviour of the officer.

Party general secretary Digvijaya Singh claimed that the former home secretary had tried to get a post-retirement position from UPA.

"Shocked at the opportunistic behaviour of RK Singh, ex HS. Why did he not bring this to the notice of the Cabinet Secretary or the PM?

"Is it not a fact that he tried to get a post-retirement position from UPA? Is it not a fact that he had approached Nitish (Kumar) for a position?" Digvijay had said on Twitter.

I&B Minister Manish Tewari, too, has asked why the bureaucrat had not spoken up earlier.

Tewari criticised what he said was a tendency after retirement among bureaucrats to speak out against their former bosses.

"I think it is extremely unfortunate. You have this very pernicious tendency of bureaucrats after retirement trying to make allegations in order to occupy media space," Tewari had said.

If Singh, or anybody else, was really so concerned, then why was not the matter put on record while they were in service, Tewari had asked.

PTI


Is the Aam Aadmi Party destined for failure?

If AAP was India's first genuine post-independence mass movement that acquired political acceptance faster than anybody else, the party appears to be heading for a downfall sooner than what most cynics predicted.

An AAP volunteer . AFP

An AAP volunteer . AFP

It's not the dissident voices from within the party, such as that of Vinod Kumar Binny and Tina Sharma who seemed to be disgruntled for not getting posts of power, nor the ambitious new recruits in other parts of the country who are speaking out of line, that will discredit the movement, but the inability of the AAP top leadership in regulating its growth that ordinary people in Delhi have set off.

Without a thoughtful intervention, the party is at the risk of an implosion that will yet again show the world that mass movements are inherently prone to decline or decay after their romantic rise.

If the African National Congress (ANC), that began as a mass uprising against apartheid and subsequently a hugely successful political formation, can flounder despite Nelson Mandela and a wider liberation movement that had both trade unions and the Left, the AAP cannot be an exception. In fact, the failure of ANC's future was evident after the first democratic elections itself.

The main reason for the ANC's decline was that the party was burdened by trust, responsibility and expectations of governance while it couldn't continue its mass movement towards economic freedom. The failures of Mandela's predecessors Thabo Mbeki and the current President Jacob Zuma are examples of how power kills political movements and even fails and corrupts its leadership. The country in fact is in desperate need for another uprising against inequality, corruption, unemployment and poor governance, issues that ANC once stood for.

During the romantic uprising of AAP, its leaders did compare their party with ANC. One idea that the AAP camp spoke of was the broad nation-wide alliances that the ANC had forged. In its efforts to scale up, the AAP also wanted to be a confederation of people's movements across the country.

Without alternatives to oppose them, the ANC is still in power and is most likely to win the next round of elections too; but the AAP can be thrown out of its dream ride faster, not just because of its wily rivals such as the BJP and the Congress, but because it's on a cruise that it has no control over. The party was not ready for power in Delhi, but went for it unprepared and it wanted to expand across the country in a phased manner, but got carried away by the Delhi results and enthusiasm of urban Indians.

Now, they have a double burden of meeting the sky-high expectations that they themselves had set in Delhi, and scaling up across India to fight in over 400 Lok Sabha seats. For an urban mass movement of common people, with an organisational history of less than a year, this is unreal and absurdly ambitious. The odds are heavily against them. The biggest threat will be the antecedents of people and movements that join the AAP.

This is the problem with petty bourgeoisie democracy - even those who want to move away from the beaten track falls in line sooner than later. The Congress, before independence was an exciting mass movement, which in no time fell into utter decadence and a never-ending dynasty; and the communists, who interestingly had an AAP-lingo in the 1960s, fell into the trap of violence, capital, opportunistic secularism, and a third front substitute to the BJP and the Congress.

Although not to second-guess AAP's political future, it will be interesting to look at what a CPM central committee resolution said in 1967: "the main pillar of out tactics is a united front from below. That is so because there is a powerful urge for unity in the masses" and the "Communists have to strengthen this unity and turn it into an active political force." Replace the communists with AAP, you get its political trajectory so far. And look at where the CPM is now.

"In India any revolution can succeed only under the direct leadership of the proletariat, with cities as the leading centre of revolution," was the CPI's take. Kejriwal swears by the leadership of "aam aadmi" (not too different from the proletariat) and AAP is a city phenomenon.

Why do mass movements fail?

American sociologists Herbert Blumer, a pioneer in the study of social movements, had identified for stages in the lifecycle of such movements: social ferment, popular excitement, formalisation, and institutionalisation. We have witnessed the social ferment, popular excitement and the formalisation in the journey of AAP so far. What they are failing is in the institutionalisation, which incidentally also includes its running the government in Delhi and the ambitious scale up across the country.

The first three promising and romantic steps were co-created with the people, but for the last stage which will define their future, the AAP is all alone and are under tremendous scrutiny. It's a tedious job that it has to deliver as a government while dealing with the trappings of petty bourgeoisie politics - "aam aadmis" such as Binny and Sharma and thousands of others asking for positions of power, people such as Captain Gopinath defining what AAP should be, and factions in Tamil Nadu openly fighting for authority.

Scholars who worked on Blumer's postulates redefined his classification further. According to them, the four stages of mass movements are these: emergence, coalescence, bureaucratisation, and DECLINE!

For the AAP, the emergence and coalescence have been a dream ride while bureaucratisation is proving to be quite messy. Unless it takes urgent steps, it will slip into decline in no time.

The AAP has history and the work of others to learn from. It should realise that even with the best intentions, it cannot have default immunity to the pitfalls of petty bourgeoisie politics. Going by the rate at which it's handling governance in Delhi and the speed with which it's filling its ranks, it certainly appears to be in trouble. When even the natural course of mass movements gaining political legitimacy fails, artificially accelerating the process is as risky as getting too rich too soon.


Is AAP yet another movement that will flourish and fail?

If AAP was India's first genuine post-independence mass movement that acquired political acceptance faster than anybody else, the party appears to be heading for a downfall sooner than what most cynics predicted.

An AAP volunteer . AFP

An AAP volunteer . AFP

It's not the dissident voices from within the party, such as that of Vinod Kumar Binny and Tina Sharma who seemed to be disgruntled for not getting posts of power, nor the ambitious new recruits in other parts of the country who are speaking out of line, that will discredit the movement, but the inability of the AAP top leadership in regulating its growth that ordinary people in Delhi have set off.

Without a thoughtful intervention, the party is at the risk of an implosion that will yet again show the world that mass movements are inherently prone to decline or decay after their romantic rise.

If the African National Congress (ANC), that began as a mass uprising against apartheid and subsequently a hugely successful political formation, can flounder despite Nelson Mandela and a wider liberation movement that had both trade unions and the Left, the AAP cannot be an exception. In fact, the failure of ANC's future was evident after the first democratic elections itself.

The main reason for the ANC's decline was that the party was burdened by trust, responsibility and expectations of governance while it couldn't continue its mass movement towards economic freedom. The failures of Mandela's predecessors Thabo Mbeki and the current President Jacob Zuma are examples of how power kills political movements and even fails and corrupts its leadership. The country in fact is in desperate need for another uprising against inequality, corruption, unemployment and poor governance, issues that ANC once stood for.

During the romantic uprising of AAP, its leaders did compare their party with ANC. One idea that the AAP camp spoke of was the broad nation-wide alliances that the ANC had forged. In its efforts to scale up, the AAP also wanted to be a confederation of people's movements across the country.

Without alternatives to oppose them, the ANC is still in power and is most likely to win the next round of elections too; but the AAP can be thrown out of its dream ride faster, not just because of its wily rivals such as the BJP and the Congress, but because it's on a cruise that it has no control over. The party was not ready for power in Delhi, but went for it unprepared and it wanted to expand across the country in a phased manner, but got carried away by the Delhi results and enthusiasm of urban Indians.

Now, they have a double burden of meeting the sky-high expectations that they themselves had set in Delhi, and scaling up across India to fight in over 400 Lok Sabha seats. For an urban mass movement of common people, with an organisational history of less than a year, this is unreal and absurdly ambitious. The odds are heavily against them. The biggest threat will be the antecedents of people and movements that join the AAP.

This is the problem with petty bourgeoisie democracy - even those who want to move away from the beaten track falls in line sooner than later. The Congress, before independence was an exciting mass movement, which in no time fell into utter decadence and a never-ending dynasty; and the communists, who interestingly had an AAP-lingo in the 1960s, fell into the trap of violence, capital, opportunistic secularism, and a third front substitute to the BJP and the Congress.

Although not to second-guess AAP's political future, it will be interesting to look at what a CPM central committee resolution said in 1967: "the main pillar of out tactics is a united front from below. That is so because there is a powerful urge for unity in the masses" and the "Communists have to strengthen this unity and turn it into an active political force." Replace the communists with AAP, you get its political trajectory so far. And look at where the CPM is now.

"In India any revolution can succeed only under the direct leadership of the proletariat, with cities as the leading centre of revolution," was the CPI's take. Kejriwal swears by the leadership of "aam aadmi" (not too different from the proletariat) and AAP is a city phenomenon.

Why do mass movements fail?

American sociologists Herbert Blumer, a pioneer in the study of social movements, had identified for stages in the lifecycle of such movements: social ferment, popular excitement, formalisation, and institutionalisation. We have witnessed the social ferment, popular excitement and the formalisation in the journey of AAP so far. What they are failing is in the institutionalisation, which incidentally also includes its running the government in Delhi and the ambitious scale up across the country.

The first three promising and romantic steps were co-created with the people, but for the last stage which will define their future, the AAP is all alone and are under tremendous scrutiny. It's a tedious job that it has to deliver as a government while dealing with the trappings of petty bourgeoisie politics - "aam aadmis" such as Binny and Sharma and thousands of others asking for positions of power, people such as Captain Gopinath defining what AAP should be, and factions in Tamil Nadu openly fighting for authority.

Scholars who worked on Blumer's postulates redefined his classification further. According to them, the four stages of mass movements are these: emergence, coalescence, bureaucratisation, and DECLINE!

For the AAP, the emergence and coalescence have been a dream ride while bureaucratisation is proving to be quite messy. Unless it takes urgent steps, it will slip into decline in no time.

The AAP has history and the work of others to learn from. It should realise that even with the best intentions, it cannot have default immunity to the pitfalls of petty bourgeoisie politics. Going by the rate at which it's handling governance in Delhi and the speed with which it's filling its ranks, it certainly appears to be in trouble. When even the natural course of mass movements gaining political legitimacy fails, artificially accelerating the process is as risky as getting too rich too soon.