Sunday, February 16, 2014

Kejriwal says resignation has nothing to do with Lok Sabha elections

New Delhi: The former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Saturday denied his move to quit was with an eye on the general elections, and said he was undecided about contesting the Lok Sabha polls.

In an interview to NDTV, Kejriwal, who submitted his and his council of ministers' resignation Friday, also refuted arguments that his government failed.

Kejriwal also said he was ready to face legal proceedings launched by Reliance chairperson Mukesh Ambani in the wake of the Aam Aadmi Party government filing a police complaint against him over the gas pricing row.

The 45-year-old chief minister, whose resignation is yet to be accepted, said he was not in a hurry to resign. "I wasn't in a hurry to resign. It was a message to the voters that we wanted to keep the corrupt out," said Kejriwal.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. Reuters.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. Reuters.

The chief minister also refuted allegations by the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that they were not given enough time to study the Jan Lokpal bill.

"They are lying. We were ready to give them more time," he said.

The Congress and the BJP voted against introduction of the bill, a key poll promise of the AAP government. In the voting, 42 members voted against the introduction of the bill, while only 27 MLAs - all AAP leaders - voted for it. The Delhi assembly has a total strength of 70.

Kejriwal had said that if his government was not allowed to pass the Jan Lokpal bill, he would resign as the fight against corruption was more important.

On the reported move by Ambani to file a legal case against him, he said: "I am ready to face legal proceedings over the FIR against Mukesh Ambani. I can even go to jail for the country."

He also proposed that the AAP will write to both Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi and to BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi on the issue of gas prices.

Earlier this week, Kejriwal had ordered filing of a police complaint against Oil Minister M. Veerappa Moily, Reliance Industries (RIL) and its chairman Mukesh Ambani for creating an artificial shortage of gas in the country and raising prices.

Asked by the channel about accusations that the AAP government failed in governance, Kejriwal said that because of the anti-corruption helpline and asking people to conduct sting operations on officials demanding bribes, many officers had stopped asking for bribes and touts had disappeared.

He said surprise inspections at hospitals led to government hospitals stocking up on medicines and other essentials. "And you say we failed in governance? We achieved this in the short period we have been in the chair," the chief minister said.

IANS


Sonia, Narasimha Rao’s relations were strained: KV Thomas in new book

New Delhi: Sonia Gandhi and late Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao had strained relations when he was the Prime Minister as she was unhappy over the slow pace of progress in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination probe, says a book written by union minister K V Thomas.

And when Gandhi chose to go public with her unhappiness over the probe in August 1995, it was a build up to what she would choose two years later to enter active politics, says Union Food Minister K V Thomas in his book Sonia--The Beloved Of The Masses.

The fact that Gandhi and Rao did not share an easy relationship was also confirmed by former minister Natwar Singh, who recollects how Rao called him one night in May, 1995 to say how he was been "insulted" by her.

Referring to a speech made by Sonia Gandhi on August 20, 1995 on the birth anniversary of Rajiv Gandhi, Thomas says in his book that her words had pained the entire nation.

Congress President Sonia Gandhi in this file photo. AFP

Congress President Sonia Gandhi in this file photo. AFP

"That was why Sonia, who was not close to Rao, pointed an accusing finger at the government. Aggrieved about the inordinate delay in the Rajiv's assassination probe, she asked if the investigation related to the killing of a former prime minister was to take so much time, what would be the fate of ordinary citizens who fights for justice?"

Thomas says it could not be construed in a simplistic way as a statement against the slow pace of the process of meting out justice. "When Congress was in power, a broadside from Sonia was indeed a censure of Narasimha Rao," he writes.

Sonia believed so long as Rao remained in power, the probe into Rajiv's death will reach nowhere, says Thomas in the book.

"Her conviction was some other agency might have masterminded the murder and engineered it through LTTE. It was circumstances which pushed Sonia into politics. How could she remain witness when the edifices of the party was crumbling," he says.

Writing in a Delhi daily last week, Natwar Singh recalls from his dairy notings of May 13, 1995 when Rao called him to his Race Course Residence in the night.

"Around 9 pm, PV walked in, he did not sit down. The normally imperturbable PV appeared flummoxed and agitated: 'I have just received her letter to me?' I said I have not seen it. The two were apparently having an epistolary war regarding the trial of Rajiv Gandhi's assassins."

Singh says what Rao said next was so unexpected that he was dumbfounded. "I cannot take her on. I could. I don't want to. What does she expect me to do?", the prime minister had said.

A junior minister in Rao's cabinet with whom he developed differences later, Singh suggested he meet Sonia Gandhi. "How often do I see her? It is a question of my self respect. Her attitude is affecting my health. How many times do I have to be insulted."

Singh told Rao that he had never discussed Rao with Gandhi but he got the impression that she felt the question of trial of her husband's assassination was not proceeding fast enough. He recalls that Rao told him of all the steps taken by the government including making P Chidambaram incharge of the assassination probe subject. "If she thinks my leaving will improve the matter, I am willing to go."

PTI


Sonia, Narasimha Rao’s relations were strained: KV Thomas in new book

New Delhi: Sonia Gandhi and late Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao had strained relations when he was the Prime Minister as she was unhappy over the slow pace of progress in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination probe, says a book written by union minister K V Thomas.

And when Gandhi chose to go public with her unhappiness over the probe in August 1995, it was a build up to what she would choose two years later to enter active politics, says Union Food Minister K V Thomas in his book Sonia--The Beloved Of The Masses.

The fact that Gandhi and Rao did not share an easy relationship was also confirmed by former minister Natwar Singh, who recollects how Rao called him one night in May, 1995 to say how he was been "insulted" by her.

Referring to a speech made by Sonia Gandhi on August 20, 1995 on the birth anniversary of Rajiv Gandhi, Thomas says in his book that her words had pained the entire nation.

Congress President Sonia Gandhi in this file photo. AFP

Congress President Sonia Gandhi in this file photo. AFP

"That was why Sonia, who was not close to Rao, pointed an accusing finger at the government. Aggrieved about the inordinate delay in the Rajiv's assassination probe, she asked if the investigation related to the killing of a former prime minister was to take so much time, what would be the fate of ordinary citizens who fights for justice?"

Thomas says it could not be construed in a simplistic way as a statement against the slow pace of the process of meting out justice. "When Congress was in power, a broadside from Sonia was indeed a censure of Narasimha Rao," he writes.

Sonia believed so long as Rao remained in power, the probe into Rajiv's death will reach nowhere, says Thomas in the book.

"Her conviction was some other agency might have masterminded the murder and engineered it through LTTE. It was circumstances which pushed Sonia into politics. How could she remain witness when the edifices of the party was crumbling," he says.

Writing in a Delhi daily last week, Natwar Singh recalls from his dairy notings of May 13, 1995 when Rao called him to his Race Course Residence in the night.

"Around 9 pm, PV walked in, he did not sit down. The normally imperturbable PV appeared flummoxed and agitated: 'I have just received her letter to me?' I said I have not seen it. The two were apparently having an epistolary war regarding the trial of Rajiv Gandhi's assassins."

Singh says what Rao said next was so unexpected that he was dumbfounded. "I cannot take her on. I could. I don't want to. What does she expect me to do?", the prime minister had said.

A junior minister in Rao's cabinet with whom he developed differences later, Singh suggested he meet Sonia Gandhi. "How often do I see her? It is a question of my self respect. Her attitude is affecting my health. How many times do I have to be insulted."

Singh told Rao that he had never discussed Rao with Gandhi but he got the impression that she felt the question of trial of her husband's assassination was not proceeding fast enough. He recalls that Rao told him of all the steps taken by the government including making P Chidambaram incharge of the assassination probe subject. "If she thinks my leaving will improve the matter, I am willing to go."

PTI


Kejriwal says resignation has nothing to do with Lok Sabha elections

New Delhi: The former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Saturday denied his move to quit was with an eye on the general elections, and said he was undecided about contesting the Lok Sabha polls.

In an interview to NDTV, Kejriwal, who submitted his and his council of ministers' resignation Friday, also refuted arguments that his government failed.

Kejriwal also said he was ready to face legal proceedings launched by Reliance chairperson Mukesh Ambani in the wake of the Aam Aadmi Party government filing a police complaint against him over the gas pricing row.

The 45-year-old chief minister, whose resignation is yet to be accepted, said he was not in a hurry to resign. "I wasn't in a hurry to resign. It was a message to the voters that we wanted to keep the corrupt out," said Kejriwal.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. Reuters.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. Reuters.

The chief minister also refuted allegations by the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that they were not given enough time to study the Jan Lokpal bill.

"They are lying. We were ready to give them more time," he said.

The Congress and the BJP voted against introduction of the bill, a key poll promise of the AAP government. In the voting, 42 members voted against the introduction of the bill, while only 27 MLAs - all AAP leaders - voted for it. The Delhi assembly has a total strength of 70.

Kejriwal had said that if his government was not allowed to pass the Jan Lokpal bill, he would resign as the fight against corruption was more important.

On the reported move by Ambani to file a legal case against him, he said: "I am ready to face legal proceedings over the FIR against Mukesh Ambani. I can even go to jail for the country."

He also proposed that the AAP will write to both Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi and to BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi on the issue of gas prices.

Earlier this week, Kejriwal had ordered filing of a police complaint against Oil Minister M. Veerappa Moily, Reliance Industries (RIL) and its chairman Mukesh Ambani for creating an artificial shortage of gas in the country and raising prices.

Asked by the channel about accusations that the AAP government failed in governance, Kejriwal said that because of the anti-corruption helpline and asking people to conduct sting operations on officials demanding bribes, many officers had stopped asking for bribes and touts had disappeared.

He said surprise inspections at hospitals led to government hospitals stocking up on medicines and other essentials. "And you say we failed in governance? We achieved this in the short period we have been in the chair," the chief minister said.

IANS


Veteran Congress leader Parasram Maderna passes away

Jaipur: Senior Congress leader and former Assembly Speaker Parasram Maderna died in Jaipur this morning following respiratory failure.

The 92-year-old Jat leader breathed his last at 6 AM, SMS Hospital Superintendent Dr Virendra Singh told PTI here.

Congress leader P Maderna in this file photo. Image from Wikimedia commons,

Congress leader P Maderna in this file photo. Image from Wikimedia commons,

He was admitted to the hospital recently after he complained of swelling in his legs and stomach. He was suffering from diabetes, osteoarthritis and septicaemia.

His elder son and former Congress minister, Mahipal Maderna, who is in jail in connection with Bhanwari Devi's murder case, was given interim bail to attend to his ailing father by a court on 12 February.

PTI


AAP cuts losses in 49 days, in position to change game again

Arvind Kejriwal may be a smarter man than we have given him credit for. His resignation as Chief Minister, after messing around with government for 49 days, may seem like a defeat to you and me, but the real point is all his failures will be forgotten over the next two months as we head into election season. What will be left, Kejriwal must be hoping, is the halo of the outsider taking on the establishment.

This is thus a good time to take note of the Aam Aadmi Party's (AAP's) gains or losses from running Delhi (or rather, running away from it). I believe he has not only rectified his strategic errors, but also made some gains from being in government. So Congress and BJP should brace for an all-out onslaught.

Here are my takeouts.

#1: Arvind Kejriwal's only mistake was to take the referendum route to deciding whether he should join government or not. He thought the people would say no, but they didn't. His own inclination was to occupy the entire opposition space and rule the streets with the minority BJP in government. The BJP didn't oblige, and the Congress unexpectedly did. Kejriwal went for the referendum – which too unexpectedly asked him to become CM. It was a mistake, and he has now exited – bruised in image, but he has cut his losses.

#2: Kejriwal & Co did not sit idle in government. While we were busy excoriating Somnath Bharti for his antics, the AAP ministers were busy collecting information and files for future use once out of government. The Congress and the BJP (which runs three municipal corporations in Delhi) should expect a series of incriminating documents and allegations to surface in Delhi.

AAP_protest_Naresh

Rejuvenated? A file picture of AAP volunteers staging a protest

#3: It is not clear if the Lt Governor, Najeeb Jung, will recommend dissolution of the assembly or call for fresh elections. At the time of writing, he seemed to have recommended keeping the assembly in suspended animation. The politically wise decision (for Congress) would be to leave it like this, since the BJP also looks likely to decline an offer to form the government again. This would obviate the need for holding the Delhi elections along with the Lok Sabha polls. This would, in a way, suit both the Congress and the BJP, but if we assume the Congress' aim is to damage the BJP, it would make sense to let both elections happen simultaneously. AAP will be waiting eagerly to know which was the Lt Governor will decide.

#4: The BJP temporarily has the advantage with AAP in Delhi, given its poor governance record in Delhi, but in the general elections all bets are off. An AAP unleashed as a street-fighting force which makes daily allegations about corruption is a different proposition from an AAP stuck in government. Freed from the constraints of office, AAP will be a more ferocious fighter.

#5: The interesting question to ask is what will happen to Congress now. While it is AAP's gameplan to equate Congress and BJP as the same and pretend to be the only non-corrupt force, the fallout is difficult to predict: one part of the Congress votebank (the underclass and the minorities) could gravitate towards AAP and the rest towards BJP. The stability-with-change vote will go to BJP and the radical, anti-establishment vote could move towards AAP in Delhi. It could mean either a complete rout for the Congress, or a serious mauling. Unless Rahul Gandhi pulls off a miracle – which no one is betting on.

#6: The AAP's real gains will come only if it manages to decimate the Congress. This will make it the main Left-wing national force by 2019, but of course a lot would depend on what happens in Delhi and Haryana in 2014.

#7: Any significant AAP gains in 2014 will lead to a new realignment of regional and national parties, since AAP's anti-corruption avatar is inimical to regional parties more than national parties. The state parties are more corrupt than the national ones – but this is not visible right now as we treat AAP as national just because it won Delhi. AAP's real battle will be in the states – but that is another story, for another time.

#8: If AAP makes a dream debut in 2014, a new centrist party will have to emerge around either the Congress or BJP. Which one it will be depends on the damage done to either by AAP and other parties in the general elections -  if any.

#9: The big casualty will be crony business – whatever happens in 2014. AAP's sudden discovery of Mukesh Ambani as villain is suspect, but the fact is India Inc's image has been sullied and it won't find it easy to restore respect without a serious soul-search. One can be certain that AAP will keep targeting business in the elections – and unless businessmen take this threat seriously, they will be in deep trouble. As Shekhar Gupta notes in his column today in The Indian Express: "The political class ….will look after itself. It's the corporates who need to be careful. They cannot repair the damage done to their image by spending a little more on corporate social responsibility. They need to embrace the equivalent of what your doctor would call lifestyle changes." The good thing about the rise of AAP is crony capitalism will be exposed. But the bad thing is it will set corporate confidence back by at least a few years – just when you need to restore it.

The ultimate takeout: Governance is not what AAP is about. Its real role is that of a changer of status quo - and for this, getting out of government was vital. In government, no party can fail to compromise.


AAP had no option but to quit, says Prashant Bhushan

New Delhi: AAP leader and senior Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan said on Saturday that the party had no option but to quit after the Jan Lokpal bill was rejected in the Delhi assembly. Bhushan said the bill was the first promise made to the public of Delhi.

"Our biggest responsibility was to form a corruption-free government and run it, but if the BJP and the Congress are not letting us pass the bill, then what is the point of us staying in power," he said.

AAP leader Prashant Bhushan. PTI

AAP leader Prashant Bhushan. PTI

He said that as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress were unlikely to form a coalition, Lt. Governor Najeeb Jung has no option but to dissolve the assembly.

On Kiran Bedi's statement that AAP was trying to hype the Jan Lokpal bill to ensure good results in Lok Sabha election, Bhushan said Bedi had become a mouthpiece of the BJP. Arvind Kejriwal resigned as Delhi chief minister Friday after the Congress and the BJP combined did not allow the bill to introduced in the assembly.

IANS